Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 vs Samsung Exynos 9610
25.5CPU28
21.3GPU—
32.5Benchmarks—
54.9Efficiencyspec-based20
3 spec wins — Qualcomm Snapdragon 6951 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 9610
InnoReviews verdict
No overall winner yet: Samsung Exynos 9610 lacks the published benchmark results an Inno Score requires, so there is no Inno Score to compare — we don't rank chips on their spec sheet alone. The spec table below still shows every difference we track.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Qualcomm Snapdragon 695
- 317% higher Max download: 2.5 Gbps vs 0.6 Gbps
- 40% lower process: 6 nm vs 10 nm
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 9610
No decisive spec advantages — this side competes on price and preference.
General
| Spec | Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 | Samsung Exynos 9610 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021 | 2018 |
| Process | 6 nm+40% | 10 nm |
| TDP (typical) | 5 W | — |
| Architecture | Armv8.2 | Armv8 |
CPU
| Spec | Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 | Samsung Exynos 9610 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 8 | 8 |
| Core configuration | 2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 + 6x1.7 GHz Cortex-A55 | 4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A73 + 4x1.7 GHz Cortex-A53 |
| Max clock | 2.2 GHz | 2.3 GHz+5% |
GPU
| Spec | Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 | Samsung Exynos 9610 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Arm Mali-G72 MP3 |
AI
| Spec | Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 | Samsung Exynos 9610 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | Hexagon NPU | — |
Memory
| Spec | Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 | Samsung Exynos 9610 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR4X-4266 | LPDDR4X |
| Max bandwidth | 17.1 GB/s | — |
Connectivity
| Spec | Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 | Samsung Exynos 9610 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | Snapdragon X51 5G | Integrated LTE Cat-12 |
| Max download | 2.5 Gbps+317% | 0.6 Gbps |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.0 |
Media
| Spec | Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 | Samsung Exynos 9610 |
|---|---|---|
| Max display | FHD+ @ 120Hz | WQXGA (2560x1600) |
| Video capture | 1080p@60fps | 4K@120fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 | Samsung Exynos 9610 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu | 411,000 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 906Bottom 38% | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 2,013Bottom 32% | — |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 360Bottom 15% | — |
Related comparisons
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695vs Samsung Exynos 990VSQualcomm Snapdragon 695vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730GVSQualcomm Snapdragon 695vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 765GVSQualcomm Snapdragon 695vs MediaTek Dimensity 6300VSSamsung Exynos 9610vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 712VSSamsung Exynos 9610vs Samsung Exynos 9611VSSamsung Exynos 9610vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 765GVSSamsung Exynos 9610vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730GVS