Skip to content
InnoReviews

Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G vs Samsung Exynos 1610

Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G
36.8Inno Score
VS
S
—Inno Score
29.7CPU30.7
24.9GPU—
48.8Benchmarks—
54.9Efficiencyspec-based—
0 spec wins — Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G1 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 1610

InnoReviews verdict

No overall winner yet: Samsung Exynos 1610 lacks the published benchmark results an Inno Score requires, so there is no Inno Score to compare — we don't rank chips on their spec sheet alone. The spec table below still shows every difference we track.

Which would you pick?

General

General comparison: Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G versus Samsung Exynos 1610
SpecQualcomm Snapdragon 778GSamsung Exynos 1610
Announced20212026
Process6 nm—
TDP (typical)5 W—
ArchitectureArmv8.2—

CPU

CPU comparison: Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G versus Samsung Exynos 1610
SpecQualcomm Snapdragon 778GSamsung Exynos 1610
Cores88
Core configuration1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 + 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 + 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A552 + 6
Max clock2.4 GHz2.4 GHz

GPU

GPU comparison: Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G versus Samsung Exynos 1610
SpecQualcomm Snapdragon 778GSamsung Exynos 1610
GPUAdreno 642LMali-G68

AI

AI comparison: Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G versus Samsung Exynos 1610
SpecQualcomm Snapdragon 778GSamsung Exynos 1610
NPUHexagon 770—

Memory

Memory comparison: Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G versus Samsung Exynos 1610
SpecQualcomm Snapdragon 778GSamsung Exynos 1610
Memory typeLPDDR5-6400—
Max bandwidth51.2 GB/s—

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G versus Samsung Exynos 1610
SpecQualcomm Snapdragon 778GSamsung Exynos 1610
ModemSnapdragon X53 5G—
Max download3.7 Gbps—
Wi-FiWi-Fi 6EWi-Fi 5
Bluetooth5.25.3

Media

Media comparison: Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G versus Samsung Exynos 1610
SpecQualcomm Snapdragon 778GSamsung Exynos 1610
Max displayFHD+ @ 144Hz—
Video capture4K@30fps—

Benchmarks

Benchmarks comparison: Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G versus Samsung Exynos 1610
SpecQualcomm Snapdragon 778GSamsung Exynos 1610
AnTuTu784,274Top 78%—
AnTuTu 11 (CPU)310,105Top 70%—
AnTuTu 11 (GPU)95,255Top 81%—
AnTuTu 11 (Memory)162,954Top 64%—
AnTuTu 11 (UX)215,960Top 84%—
Geekbench 6 (single)1,020Top 51%—
Geekbench 6 (multi)2,930Top 47%—
3DMark Wild Life Extreme800Top 88%—

Related comparisons

Try another matchup