Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 vs Samsung Exynos 1610
44.1CPU30.7
43.9GPU—
61.5Benchmarks—
69Efficiencyspec-based—
1 spec wins — Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 11 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 1610
InnoReviews verdict
No overall winner yet: Samsung Exynos 1610 lacks the published benchmark results an Inno Score requires, so there is no Inno Score to compare — we don't rank chips on their spec sheet alone. The spec table below still shows every difference we track.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
- Stronger CPU score: 44 vs 31
- 33% higher Max clock: 3.2 GHz vs 2.4 GHz
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 1610
No decisive spec advantages — this side competes on price and preference.
General
| Spec | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 | Samsung Exynos 1610 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022 | 2026 |
| Process | 4 nm | — |
| TDP (typical) | 8 W | — |
| Architecture | Armv9 | — |
CPU
| Spec | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 | Samsung Exynos 1610 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 8 | 8 |
| Core configuration | 1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X2 + 3x2.75 GHz Cortex-A710 + 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510 | 2 + 6 |
| Max clock | 3.2 GHz+33% | 2.4 GHz |
GPU
| Spec | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 | Samsung Exynos 1610 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Adreno 730 | Mali-G68 |
| GPU clock | 900 MHz | — |
AI
| Spec | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 | Samsung Exynos 1610 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | Hexagon NPU | — |
Memory
| Spec | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 | Samsung Exynos 1610 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR5-6400 | — |
| Max bandwidth | 51.2 GB/s | — |
Connectivity
| Spec | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 | Samsung Exynos 1610 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | Snapdragon X65 5G | — |
| Max download | 10 Gbps | — |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 6E | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.3 |
Media
| Spec | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 | Samsung Exynos 1610 |
|---|---|---|
| Max display | 4K @ 60Hz / QHD+ @ 144Hz | — |
| Video capture | 8K@30fps | — |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 | Samsung Exynos 1610 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu | 1,300,000 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 1,800Top 25% | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 4,600Top 27% | — |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 2,800Top 43% | — |
Related comparisons
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4VSQualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1vs Samsung Exynos 1580VSQualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1vs MediaTek Dimensity 8350VSQualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1vs Google Tensor G4VSSamsung Exynos 1610vs Huawei Kirin 9030SVSSamsung Exynos 1610vs Samsung Exynos 1680VSSamsung Exynos 1610vs MediaTek Helio G200VSSamsung Exynos 1610vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4VS