Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 vs Samsung Exynos 1610
33.5CPU30.7
28.6GPU—
51.1Benchmarks—
49.3AIspec-based—
32.1Efficiencyspec-based—
1 spec wins — Qualcomm Snapdragon 8651 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 1610
InnoReviews verdict
No overall winner yet: Samsung Exynos 1610 lacks the published benchmark results an Inno Score requires, so there is no Inno Score to compare — we don't rank chips on their spec sheet alone. The spec table below still shows every difference we track.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
- 18% higher Max clock: 2.84 GHz vs 2.4 GHz
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 1610
No decisive spec advantages — this side competes on price and preference.
General
| Spec | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 | Samsung Exynos 1610 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2020 | 2026 |
| Process | 7 nm | — |
| TDP (typical) | 10 W | — |
| Architecture | Armv8.2 | — |
CPU
| Spec | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 | Samsung Exynos 1610 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 8 | 8 |
| Core configuration | 1x2.84 GHz Cortex-A77 + 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A77 + 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 | 2 + 6 |
| Max clock | 2.84 GHz+18% | 2.4 GHz |
GPU
| Spec | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 | Samsung Exynos 1610 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Qualcomm Adreno 650 | Mali-G68 |
| GPU clock | 587 MHz | — |
AI
| Spec | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 | Samsung Exynos 1610 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | Qualcomm Hexagon 698 | — |
| AI performance | 15 TOPS | — |
Memory
| Spec | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 | Samsung Exynos 1610 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR5-2750 | — |
| Max bandwidth | 44 GB/s | — |
Connectivity
| Spec | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 | Samsung Exynos 1610 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | Snapdragon X55 5G (external) | — |
| Max download | 7.5 Gbps | — |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.3 |
Media
| Spec | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 | Samsung Exynos 1610 |
|---|---|---|
| Max display | 4K @ 60Hz / QHD+ @ 144Hz | — |
| Video capture | 8K@30fps | — |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 | Samsung Exynos 1610 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu | 861,546Top 70% | — |
| AnTuTu 11 (CPU) | 306,337Top 73% | — |
| AnTuTu 11 (GPU) | 162,790Top 67% | — |
| AnTuTu 11 (Memory) | 152,804Top 81% | — |
| AnTuTu 11 (UX) | 239,615Top 70% | — |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 1,100Top 45% | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 3,300Top 40% | — |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 1,250Top 72% | — |
Related comparisons
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865vs MediaTek Helio G200VSQualcomm Snapdragon 865vs MediaTek Dimensity 920VSQualcomm Snapdragon 865vs MediaTek Dimensity 1200VSQualcomm Snapdragon 865vs MediaTek Dimensity 7020VSSamsung Exynos 1610vs Huawei Kirin 9030SVSSamsung Exynos 1610vs Samsung Exynos 1680VSSamsung Exynos 1610vs MediaTek Helio G200VSSamsung Exynos 1610vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4VS