Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 vs Samsung Exynos 2400e
33.5CPU49.9
28.6GPU47.8
51.1Benchmarks66.7
49.3AI—
32.1Efficiency66.5
0 spec wins — Qualcomm Snapdragon 8659 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 2400e
InnoReviews verdict
Samsung Exynos 2400e wins this mobile chipset face-off, 55.8 to 37.2, pulling ahead mainly in efficiency (+34) and GPU (+19). Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
No decisive spec advantages — this side competes on price and preference.
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 2400e
- Stronger CPU score: 50 vs 34
- Stronger GPU score: 48 vs 29
- Stronger benchmarks score: 67 vs 51
- Stronger efficiency score: 67 vs 32
- 188% higher 3DMark Wild Life Extreme: 3,600 vs 1,250
General
| Spec | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 | Samsung Exynos 2400e |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2020 | 2024 |
| Process | 7 nm | 4 nm+43% |
| TDP (typical) | 10 W | 9 W+10% |
| Architecture | Armv8.2 | Armv9.2 |
CPU
| Spec | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 | Samsung Exynos 2400e |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 8 | 10+25% |
| Core configuration | 1x2.84 GHz Cortex-A77 + 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A77 + 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 | 1x3.1 GHz Cortex-X4 + 2x2.9 GHz Cortex-A720 + 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A720 + 4x1.95 GHz Cortex-A520 |
| Max clock | 2.84 GHz | 3.1 GHz+9% |
GPU
| Spec | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 | Samsung Exynos 2400e |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Qualcomm Adreno 650 | Samsung Xclipse 940 |
| GPU clock | 587 MHz | — |
AI
| Spec | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 | Samsung Exynos 2400e |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | Qualcomm Hexagon 698 | Samsung NPU |
| AI performance | 15 TOPS | — |
Memory
| Spec | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 | Samsung Exynos 2400e |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR5-2750 | LPDDR5X |
| Max bandwidth | 44 GB/s | — |
Connectivity
| Spec | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 | Samsung Exynos 2400e |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | Snapdragon X55 5G (external) | Integrated Exynos 5G modem |
| Max download | 7.5 Gbps | — |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6E |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.3 |
Media
| Spec | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 | Samsung Exynos 2400e |
|---|---|---|
| Max display | 4K @ 60Hz / QHD+ @ 144Hz | QHD+ @ 120Hz |
| Video capture | 8K@30fps | 8K@30fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 | Samsung Exynos 2400e |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu 10 | 861,546Top 39% | 1,600,000+86%Top 17% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 1,100Top 42% | 2,050+86%Top 18% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 3,300Top 38% | 6,400+94%Top 16% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 1,250Top 69% | 3,600+188%Top 27% |
| AnTuTu 10 (CPU) | 306,337Top 72% | — |
| AnTuTu 10 (GPU) | 162,790Top 63% | — |
| AnTuTu 10 (Memory) | 152,804Top 80% | — |
| AnTuTu 10 (UX) | 239,615Top 69% | — |
Related comparisons
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865vs MediaTek Helio G200VSQualcomm Snapdragon 865vs MediaTek Dimensity 920VSQualcomm Snapdragon 865vs MediaTek Dimensity 1200VSQualcomm Snapdragon 865vs MediaTek Dimensity 7020VSSamsung Exynos 2400evs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2VSSamsung Exynos 2400evs MediaTek Dimensity 9200VSSamsung Exynos 2400evs Apple A16 BionicVSSamsung Exynos 2400evs MediaTek Dimensity 8400VS
