Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 vs Samsung Exynos 2600
33.5CPU72.6
28.6GPU77.4
51.1Benchmarks81.1
49.3AIspec-based—
32.1Efficiencyspec-based100
0 spec wins — Qualcomm Snapdragon 86511 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 2600
InnoReviews verdict
Samsung Exynos 2600 wins this mobile chipset face-off, 80.4 to 37.2, pulling ahead mainly in GPU (+49) and CPU (+39). Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
No decisive spec advantages — this side competes on price and preference.
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 2600
- Stronger CPU score: 73 vs 34
- Stronger GPU score: 77 vs 29
- Stronger benchmarks score: 81 vs 51
- 547% higher AnTuTu 11 (GPU): 1,052,625 vs 162,790
- 478% higher 3DMark Wild Life Extreme: 7,230 vs 1,250
General
| Spec | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 | Samsung Exynos 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2020 | 2026 |
| Process | 7 nm | 2 nm+71% |
| TDP (typical) | 10 W | — |
| Architecture | Armv8.2 | Armv9.3 |
CPU
| Spec | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 | Samsung Exynos 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 8 | 10+25% |
| Core configuration | 1x2.84 GHz Cortex-A77 + 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A77 + 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 | 1x Arm C1-Ultra + 3x Arm C1-Pro (high-performance) + 6x Arm C1-Pro (high-efficiency) |
| Max clock | 2.84 GHz | — |
GPU
| Spec | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 | Samsung Exynos 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Qualcomm Adreno 650 | Samsung Xclipse 960 |
| GPU clock | 587 MHz | — |
AI
| Spec | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 | Samsung Exynos 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | Qualcomm Hexagon 698 | Samsung NPU |
| AI performance | 15 TOPS | — |
Memory
| Spec | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 | Samsung Exynos 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR5-2750 | — |
| Max bandwidth | 44 GB/s | — |
Connectivity
| Spec | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 | Samsung Exynos 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | Snapdragon X55 5G (external) | — |
| Max download | 7.5 Gbps | — |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 6 | — |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | — |
Media
| Spec | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 | Samsung Exynos 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| Max display | 4K @ 60Hz / QHD+ @ 144Hz | — |
| Video capture | 8K@30fps | — |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 | Samsung Exynos 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu 11 | 861,546Top 70% | 2,827,538+228%Top 12% |
| AnTuTu 11 (CPU) | 306,337Top 73% | 947,776+209%Top 9% |
| AnTuTu 11 (GPU) | 162,790Top 67% | 1,052,625+547%Top 12% |
| AnTuTu 11 (Memory) | 152,804Top 81% | 347,409+127%Top 23% |
| AnTuTu 11 (UX) | 239,615Top 70% | 479,728+100%Top 25% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 1,100Top 45% | 2,995+172%Top 9% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 3,300Top 40% | 10,824+228%Top 4% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 1,250Top 72% | 7,230+478%Top 7% |
Related comparisons
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865vs MediaTek Helio G200VSQualcomm Snapdragon 865vs MediaTek Dimensity 920VSQualcomm Snapdragon 865vs MediaTek Dimensity 1200VSQualcomm Snapdragon 865vs MediaTek Dimensity 7020VSSamsung Exynos 2600vs MediaTek Dimensity 9500VSSamsung Exynos 2600vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5VSSamsung Exynos 2600vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 EliteVSSamsung Exynos 2600vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5VS

