Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 vs Samsung Exynos 9611
37.2CPU21.6
34.3GPU—
55.9Benchmarks20
64AI—
55.9Efficiency44.2
7 spec wins — Qualcomm Snapdragon 8881 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 9611
InnoReviews verdict
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 wins this mobile chipset face-off, 45.7 to 26.3, pulling ahead mainly in benchmarks (+36) and CPU (+16). Samsung Exynos 9611 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
- Stronger CPU score: 37 vs 22
- Stronger benchmarks score: 56 vs 20
- Stronger efficiency score: 56 vs 44
- 384% higher AnTuTu 10: 1,040,324 vs 215,000
- 314% higher Geekbench 6 (single): 1,450 vs 350
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 9611
- 44% lower TDP (typical): 5 W vs 9 W
General
| Spec | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 | Samsung Exynos 9611 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2020 | 2019 |
| Process | 5 nm+50% | 10 nm |
| TDP (typical) | 9 W | 5 W+44% |
| Architecture | Armv8.2 | Armv8 |
CPU
| Spec | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 | Samsung Exynos 9611 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 8 | 8 |
| Core configuration | 1x2.84 GHz Cortex-X1 + 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 + 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 | 4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A73 + 4x1.7 GHz Cortex-A53 |
| Max clock | 2.84 GHz+23% | 2.3 GHz |
GPU
| Spec | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 | Samsung Exynos 9611 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Adreno 660 | Arm Mali-G72 MP3 |
| GPU clock | 840 MHz | — |
AI
| Spec | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 | Samsung Exynos 9611 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | Hexagon 780 | — |
| AI performance | 26 TOPS | — |
Memory
| Spec | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 | Samsung Exynos 9611 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR5-6400 | LPDDR4X-1866 |
| Max bandwidth | 51.2 GB/s+244% | 14.9 GB/s |
Connectivity
| Spec | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 | Samsung Exynos 9611 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | Snapdragon X60 5G | Integrated LTE Cat-12 |
| Max download | 7.5 Gbps | — |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 6E | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.0 |
Media
| Spec | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 | Samsung Exynos 9611 |
|---|---|---|
| Max display | 4K @ 60Hz / QHD+ @ 144Hz | FHD+ @ 60Hz |
| Video capture | 8K@30fps | 4K@30fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 | Samsung Exynos 9611 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu 10 | 1,040,324+384%Top 31% | 215,000Top 93% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 1,450+314%Top 28% | 350Top 89% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 3,650+192%Top 34% | 1,250Top 90% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 1,550Top 63% | — |
| AnTuTu 10 (CPU) | 379,461Top 52% | — |
| AnTuTu 10 (GPU) | 169,822Top 60% | — |
| AnTuTu 10 (Memory) | 200,968Top 49% | — |
| AnTuTu 10 (UX) | 290,073Top 52% | — |
Related comparisons
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200VSQualcomm Snapdragon 888vs Samsung Exynos 2200VSQualcomm Snapdragon 888vs Apple A14 BionicVSQualcomm Snapdragon 888vs Samsung Exynos 2100VSSamsung Exynos 9611vs MediaTek Helio G88VSSamsung Exynos 9611vs MediaTek Helio G85VSSamsung Exynos 9611vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 439VSSamsung Exynos 9611vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 450VS
