Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 vs Samsung Exynos 2200
37.2CPU38.9
34.3GPU34.3
55.9Benchmarks57.3
64AIspec-based—
55.9Efficiencyspec-based66.5
1 spec wins — Qualcomm Snapdragon 8885 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 2200
InnoReviews verdict
This one is close to a dead heat: Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 scores 45.7 against 46.3 for Samsung Exynos 2200. Pick by the categories that matter to you — Samsung Exynos 2200 edges ahead in CPU and benchmarks, or by price.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
No decisive spec advantages — this side competes on price and preference.
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 2200
- 26% higher 3DMark Wild Life Extreme: 1,946 vs 1,550
- 20% lower process: 4 nm vs 5 nm
- 10% higher Geekbench 6 (single): 1,601 vs 1,450
General
| Spec | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 | Samsung Exynos 2200 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2020 | 2022 |
| Process | 5 nm | 4 nm+20% |
| TDP (typical) | 9 W | 9 W |
| Architecture | Armv8.2 | Armv9 |
CPU
| Spec | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 | Samsung Exynos 2200 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 8 | 8 |
| Core configuration | 1x2.84 GHz Cortex-X1 + 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 + 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 | 1x2.8 GHz Cortex-X2 + 3x2.52 GHz Cortex-A710 + 4x1.82 GHz Cortex-A510 |
| Max clock | 2.84 GHz+1% | 2.8 GHz |
GPU
| Spec | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 | Samsung Exynos 2200 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Adreno 660 | Samsung Xclipse 920 |
| GPU clock | 840 MHz | — |
AI
| Spec | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 | Samsung Exynos 2200 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | Hexagon 780 | Samsung NPU |
| AI performance | 26 TOPS | — |
Memory
| Spec | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 | Samsung Exynos 2200 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR5-6400 | LPDDR5 |
| Max bandwidth | 51.2 GB/s | — |
Connectivity
| Spec | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 | Samsung Exynos 2200 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | Snapdragon X60 5G | Integrated Exynos 5G modem |
| Max download | 7.5 Gbps | — |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 6E | — |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | — |
Media
| Spec | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 | Samsung Exynos 2200 |
|---|---|---|
| Max display | 4K @ 60Hz / QHD+ @ 144Hz | — |
| Video capture | 8K@30fps | 8K@30fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 | Samsung Exynos 2200 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTuDifferent AnTuTu versions — not compared | 1,040,324Top 50% | 1,100,000 |
| AnTuTu 11 (CPU) | 379,461Bottom 51% | — |
| AnTuTu 11 (GPU) | 169,822Bottom 47% | — |
| AnTuTu 11 (Memory) | 200,968Top 45% | — |
| AnTuTu 11 (UX) | 290,073Top 48% | — |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 1,450Top 27% | 1,601+10%Top 23% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 3,650Top 36% | 3,938+8%Top 33% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 1,550Top 44% | 1,946+26%Top 36% |
Related comparisons
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200VSQualcomm Snapdragon 888vs Huawei Kirin T93 ProVSQualcomm Snapdragon 888vs Apple A14 BionicVSQualcomm Snapdragon 888vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3VSSamsung Exynos 2200vs Apple A14 BionicVSSamsung Exynos 2200vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200VSSamsung Exynos 2200vs Huawei Kirin T93 ProVSSamsung Exynos 2200vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2VS

