Qualcomm Snapdragon C vs Samsung Exynos 2400e
30.7CPU49.9
—GPU47.8
—Benchmarks66.7
39.4Efficiency66.5
1 spec wins — Qualcomm Snapdragon C4 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 2400e
InnoReviews verdict
Samsung Exynos 2400e wins this mobile chipset face-off, 55.8 to 33.6, pulling ahead mainly in efficiency (+27) and CPU (+19). Qualcomm Snapdragon C still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Qualcomm Snapdragon C
- 22% lower TDP (typical): 7 W vs 9 W
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 2400e
- Stronger CPU score: 50 vs 31
- Stronger efficiency score: 67 vs 39
- 50% lower process: 4 nm vs 8 nm
- 29% higher Max clock: 3.1 GHz vs 2.4 GHz
- 25% higher cores: 10 vs 8
General
| Spec | Qualcomm Snapdragon C | Samsung Exynos 2400e |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2019 | 2024 |
| Process | 8 nm | 4 nm+50% |
| TDP (typical) | 7 W+22% | 9 W |
| Architecture | ARMv8-A | Armv9.2 |
CPU
| Spec | Qualcomm Snapdragon C | Samsung Exynos 2400e |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 8 | 10+25% |
| Core configuration | 2x 2.4 GHz Kryo 468 Gold + 6x 1.8 GHz Kryo 468 Silver | 1x3.1 GHz Cortex-X4 + 2x2.9 GHz Cortex-A720 + 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A720 + 4x1.95 GHz Cortex-A520 |
| Max clock | 2.4 GHz | 3.1 GHz+29% |
GPU
| Spec | Qualcomm Snapdragon C | Samsung Exynos 2400e |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Adreno 618 | Samsung Xclipse 940 |
AI
| Spec | Qualcomm Snapdragon C | Samsung Exynos 2400e |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | — | Samsung NPU |
Memory
| Spec | Qualcomm Snapdragon C | Samsung Exynos 2400e |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR4x | LPDDR5X |
Connectivity
| Spec | Qualcomm Snapdragon C | Samsung Exynos 2400e |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | Snapdragon X15 LTE | Integrated Exynos 5G modem |
| Max download | 0.8 Gbps | — |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 6E |
| Bluetooth | 5.0 | 5.3 |
Media
| Spec | Qualcomm Snapdragon C | Samsung Exynos 2400e |
|---|---|---|
| Max display | 2560x1440 | QHD+ @ 120Hz |
| Video capture | 4K at 30fps | 8K@30fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Qualcomm Snapdragon C | Samsung Exynos 2400e |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu 10 | — | 1,600,000Top 17% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | — | 2,050Top 18% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | — | 6,400Top 16% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 3,600Top 27% |
Related comparisons
Qualcomm Snapdragon Cvs MediaTek Dimensity 810VSQualcomm Snapdragon Cvs Unisoc Tiger T760VSQualcomm Snapdragon Cvs MediaTek Dimensity 6080VSQualcomm Snapdragon Cvs MediaTek Dimensity 6100+VSSamsung Exynos 2400evs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2VSSamsung Exynos 2400evs MediaTek Dimensity 9200VSSamsung Exynos 2400evs Apple A16 BionicVSSamsung Exynos 2400evs MediaTek Dimensity 8400VS

