Qualcomm Snapdragon C vs Samsung Exynos 2500
30.7CPU57.2
—GPU54.3
—Benchmarks74.2
—AI85.9
39.4Efficiency79.6
1 spec wins — Qualcomm Snapdragon C4 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 2500
InnoReviews verdict
Samsung Exynos 2500 wins this mobile chipset face-off, 66.1 to 33.6, pulling ahead mainly in efficiency (+40) and CPU (+27). Qualcomm Snapdragon C still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Qualcomm Snapdragon C
- 12% lower TDP (typical): 7 W vs 8 W
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 2500
- Stronger CPU score: 57 vs 31
- Stronger efficiency score: 80 vs 39
- 62% lower process: 3 nm vs 8 nm
- 38% higher Max clock: 3.3 GHz vs 2.4 GHz
- 25% higher cores: 10 vs 8
General
| Spec | Qualcomm Snapdragon C | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2019 | 2025 |
| Process | 8 nm | 3 nm+62% |
| TDP (typical) | 7 W+12% | 8 W |
| Architecture | ARMv8-A | Armv9.2 |
CPU
| Spec | Qualcomm Snapdragon C | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 8 | 10+25% |
| Core configuration | 2x 2.4 GHz Kryo 468 Gold + 6x 1.8 GHz Kryo 468 Silver | 1x3.3 GHz Cortex-X925 + 2x2.75 GHz Cortex-A725 + 5x2.36 GHz Cortex-A725 + 2x1.8 GHz Cortex-A520 |
| Max clock | 2.4 GHz | 3.3 GHz+38% |
GPU
| Spec | Qualcomm Snapdragon C | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Adreno 618 | Samsung Xclipse 950 |
AI
| Spec | Qualcomm Snapdragon C | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | — | Samsung NPU |
| AI performance | — | 59 TOPS |
Memory
| Spec | Qualcomm Snapdragon C | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR4x | LPDDR5X |
Connectivity
| Spec | Qualcomm Snapdragon C | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | Snapdragon X15 LTE | Integrated Exynos 5G modem |
| Max download | 0.8 Gbps | — |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 5 | — |
| Bluetooth | 5.0 | — |
Media
| Spec | Qualcomm Snapdragon C | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| Max display | 2560x1440 | — |
| Video capture | 4K at 30fps | 8K@30fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Qualcomm Snapdragon C | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu 10 | — | 2,150,000Top 8% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | — | 2,300Top 12% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | — | 8,200Top 9% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 4,400Top 17% |
Related comparisons
Qualcomm Snapdragon Cvs MediaTek Dimensity 810VSQualcomm Snapdragon Cvs Unisoc Tiger T760VSQualcomm Snapdragon Cvs MediaTek Dimensity 6080VSQualcomm Snapdragon Cvs MediaTek Dimensity 6100+VSSamsung Exynos 2500vs Apple A18VSSamsung Exynos 2500vs Apple A18 ProVSSamsung Exynos 2500vs Apple A17 ProVSSamsung Exynos 2500vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3VS

