Skip to content
InnoReviews

Samsung Exynos 1280 vs Unisoc T620

Samsung Exynos 1280
39.6Inno Score
VS
U
—Inno Score
28.1CPU25.3
—GPU55
37.2Benchmarks—
65.6Efficiencyspec-based20
2 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 12801 spec wins — Unisoc T620

InnoReviews verdict

No overall winner yet: Unisoc T620 lacks the published benchmark results an Inno Score requires, so there is no Inno Score to compare — we don't rank chips on their spec sheet alone. The spec table below still shows every difference we track.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 1280

  • 58% lower process: 5 nm vs 12 nm

Reasons to pick the Unisoc T620

No decisive spec advantages — this side competes on price and preference.

General

General comparison: Samsung Exynos 1280 versus Unisoc T620
SpecSamsung Exynos 1280Unisoc T620
Announced20222024
Process5 nm+58%12 nm
TDP (typical)5 W—
ArchitectureArmv8.2Armv8.2

CPU

CPU comparison: Samsung Exynos 1280 versus Unisoc T620
SpecSamsung Exynos 1280Unisoc T620
Cores88
Core configuration2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 + 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A552x2.2 GHz Cortex-A75 + 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55
Max clock2.4 GHz+9%2.2 GHz

GPU

GPU comparison: Samsung Exynos 1280 versus Unisoc T620
SpecSamsung Exynos 1280Unisoc T620
GPUArm Mali-G68 MP4Arm Mali-G57 MP1
GPU clock—850 MHz

Memory

Memory comparison: Samsung Exynos 1280 versus Unisoc T620
SpecSamsung Exynos 1280Unisoc T620
Memory typeLPDDR4X-2133LPDDR4X-1866
Max bandwidth17.1 GB/s—

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: Samsung Exynos 1280 versus Unisoc T620
SpecSamsung Exynos 1280Unisoc T620
ModemIntegrated 5G (sub-6)Integrated LTE Cat-7 (DL) / Cat-13 (UL)
Wi-FiWi-Fi 5Wi-Fi 5
Bluetooth5.15.2

Media

Media comparison: Samsung Exynos 1280 versus Unisoc T620
SpecSamsung Exynos 1280Unisoc T620
Max displayFHD+ @ 120HzFHD+ @ 90Hz / HD+ @ 120Hz
Video capture4K@30fps1080p@60fps

Benchmarks

Benchmarks comparison: Samsung Exynos 1280 versus Unisoc T620
SpecSamsung Exynos 1280Unisoc T620
AnTuTu495,000—
Geekbench 6 (single)1,000Bottom 45%—
Geekbench 6 (multi)2,350Bottom 41%—

Related comparisons

Try another matchup