Skip to content
InnoReviews

Samsung Exynos 1280 vs Unisoc T7300

Samsung Exynos 1280
39.6Inno Score
VS
Unisoc T7300
—Inno Score
28.1CPU25.3
—GPU65
37.2Benchmarks—
65.6Efficiencyspec-based36
2 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 12801 spec wins — Unisoc T7300

InnoReviews verdict

No overall winner yet: Unisoc T7300 lacks the published benchmark results an Inno Score requires, so there is no Inno Score to compare — we don't rank chips on their spec sheet alone. The spec table below still shows every difference we track.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 1280

  • 17% lower process: 5 nm vs 6 nm

Reasons to pick the Unisoc T7300

No decisive spec advantages — this side competes on price and preference.

General

General comparison: Samsung Exynos 1280 versus Unisoc T7300
SpecSamsung Exynos 1280Unisoc T7300
Announced20222025
Process5 nm+17%6 nm
TDP (typical)5 W—
ArchitectureArmv8.2Armv8.2

CPU

CPU comparison: Samsung Exynos 1280 versus Unisoc T7300
SpecSamsung Exynos 1280Unisoc T7300
Cores88
Core configuration2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 + 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A552x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 + 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55
Max clock2.4 GHz+9%2.2 GHz

GPU

GPU comparison: Samsung Exynos 1280 versus Unisoc T7300
SpecSamsung Exynos 1280Unisoc T7300
GPUArm Mali-G68 MP4Arm Mali-G57 MC2
GPU clock—950 MHz

Memory

Memory comparison: Samsung Exynos 1280 versus Unisoc T7300
SpecSamsung Exynos 1280Unisoc T7300
Memory typeLPDDR4X-2133LPDDR4X-2133
Max bandwidth17.1 GB/s—

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: Samsung Exynos 1280 versus Unisoc T7300
SpecSamsung Exynos 1280Unisoc T7300
ModemIntegrated 5G (sub-6)Integrated LTE Cat-7 (DL) / Cat-13 (UL)
Wi-FiWi-Fi 5Wi-Fi 5 (Wi-Fi 6 optional)
Bluetooth5.15.4

Media

Media comparison: Samsung Exynos 1280 versus Unisoc T7300
SpecSamsung Exynos 1280Unisoc T7300
Max displayFHD+ @ 120HzFHD+ @ 120Hz
Video capture4K@30fps2K@30fps

Benchmarks

Benchmarks comparison: Samsung Exynos 1280 versus Unisoc T7300
SpecSamsung Exynos 1280Unisoc T7300
AnTuTu495,000—
Geekbench 6 (single)1,000Bottom 45%—
Geekbench 6 (multi)2,350Bottom 41%—

Related comparisons

Try another matchup