Skip to content
InnoReviews

Samsung Exynos 1380 vs Unisoc T8200

Samsung Exynos 1380
37.7Inno Score
VS
Unisoc T8200
—Inno Score
29.2CPU28
25GPU55
47.3Benchmarks—
63.2Efficiencyspec-based36
2 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 13801 spec wins — Unisoc T8200

InnoReviews verdict

No overall winner yet: Unisoc T8200 lacks the published benchmark results an Inno Score requires, so there is no Inno Score to compare — we don't rank chips on their spec sheet alone. The spec table below still shows every difference we track.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 1380

  • 17% lower process: 5 nm vs 6 nm

Reasons to pick the Unisoc T8200

  • Stronger GPU score: 55 vs 25

General

General comparison: Samsung Exynos 1380 versus Unisoc T8200
SpecSamsung Exynos 1380Unisoc T8200
Announced20232025
Process5 nm+17%6 nm
TDP (typical)6 W—
ArchitectureArmv8.2Armv8.2

CPU

CPU comparison: Samsung Exynos 1380 versus Unisoc T8200
SpecSamsung Exynos 1380Unisoc T8200
Cores88
Core configuration4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 + 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A552x2.3 GHz Cortex-A76 + 6x2.1 GHz Cortex-A55
Max clock2.4 GHz+4%2.3 GHz

GPU

GPU comparison: Samsung Exynos 1380 versus Unisoc T8200
SpecSamsung Exynos 1380Unisoc T8200
GPUArm Mali-G68 MP5Arm Mali-G57 MC2
GPU clock—850 MHz

AI

AI comparison: Samsung Exynos 1380 versus Unisoc T8200
SpecSamsung Exynos 1380Unisoc T8200
NPUSamsung NPU—

Memory

Memory comparison: Samsung Exynos 1380 versus Unisoc T8200
SpecSamsung Exynos 1380Unisoc T8200
Memory typeLPDDR5LPDDR4X-2133

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: Samsung Exynos 1380 versus Unisoc T8200
SpecSamsung Exynos 1380Unisoc T8200
ModemIntegrated Exynos 5G modemIntegrated 5G (SA/NSA)
Wi-FiWi-Fi 6EWi-Fi 6 (1x1, optional)
Bluetooth5.35.4

Media

Media comparison: Samsung Exynos 1380 versus Unisoc T8200
SpecSamsung Exynos 1380Unisoc T8200
Max displayFHD+ @ 120HzFHD+ @ 120Hz
Video capture4K@30fps4K@30fps

Benchmarks

Benchmarks comparison: Samsung Exynos 1380 versus Unisoc T8200
SpecSamsung Exynos 1380Unisoc T8200
AnTuTu740,251Bottom 18%—
AnTuTu 11 (CPU)290,514Bottom 21%—
AnTuTu 11 (GPU)89,805Bottom 21%—
AnTuTu 11 (Memory)132,447Bottom 11%—
AnTuTu 11 (UX)227,485Bottom 29%—
Geekbench 6 (single)1,010Bottom 46%—
Geekbench 6 (multi)2,760Bottom 46%—
3DMark Wild Life Extreme808Bottom 19%—

Related comparisons

Try another matchup