Samsung Exynos 1480 vs Unisoc T7225
33.7CPU20
28.2GPU35
54.8Benchmarks—
73.8Efficiencyspec-based20
2 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 14801 spec wins — Unisoc T7225
InnoReviews verdict
No overall winner yet: Unisoc T7225 lacks the published benchmark results an Inno Score requires, so there is no Inno Score to compare — we don't rank chips on their spec sheet alone. The spec table below still shows every difference we track.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 1480
- Stronger CPU score: 34 vs 20
- 67% lower process: 4 nm vs 12 nm
- 53% higher Max clock: 2.75 GHz vs 1.8 GHz
Reasons to pick the Unisoc T7225
- Stronger GPU score: 35 vs 28
General
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 1480 | Unisoc T7225 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024 | 2025 |
| Process | 4 nm+67% | 12 nm |
| TDP (typical) | 6 W | — |
| Architecture | Armv8.2 | Armv8.2 |
CPU
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 1480 | Unisoc T7225 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 8 | 8 |
| Core configuration | 4x2.75 GHz Cortex-A78 + 4x2.05 GHz Cortex-A55 | 2x1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 + 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 |
| Max clock | 2.75 GHz+53% | 1.8 GHz |
GPU
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 1480 | Unisoc T7225 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Samsung Xclipse 530 | Arm Mali-G57 MP1 |
| GPU clock | — | 650 MHz |
AI
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 1480 | Unisoc T7225 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | Samsung NPU | — |
Memory
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 1480 | Unisoc T7225 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR4X-1600 |
Connectivity
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 1480 | Unisoc T7225 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | Integrated Exynos 5G modem | Integrated LTE Cat-7 |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 6E | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.2 |
Media
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 1480 | Unisoc T7225 |
|---|---|---|
| Max display | FHD+ @ 144Hz | FHD+ @ 60Hz / HD+ @ 90Hz |
| Video capture | 4K@30fps | 1080p@60fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 1480 | Unisoc T7225 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu | 997,950Bottom 48% | — |
| AnTuTu 11 (CPU) | 353,082Bottom 43% | — |
| AnTuTu 11 (GPU) | 224,206Top 50% | — |
| AnTuTu 11 (Memory) | 162,521Bottom 39% | — |
| AnTuTu 11 (UX) | 258,141Bottom 41% | — |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 1,150Top 40% | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 3,400Top 39% | — |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 1,200Bottom 38% | — |
Related comparisons
Samsung Exynos 1480vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4VSSamsung Exynos 1480vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100VSSamsung Exynos 1480vs Samsung Exynos 2100VSSamsung Exynos 1480vs Google Tensor G2VSUnisoc T7225vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4s Gen 2VSUnisoc T7225vs MediaTek Helio G81VSUnisoc T7225vs MediaTek Helio G91VSUnisoc T7225vs Huawei Kirin 8020VS