Skip to content
InnoReviews

Samsung Exynos 1610 vs Samsung Exynos 990

S
—Inno Score
VS
Samsung Exynos 990
30.8Inno Score
30.7CPU29.8
—GPU25.7
—Benchmarks37.4
—Efficiencyspec-based32.1
1 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 16101 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 990

InnoReviews verdict

No overall winner yet: Samsung Exynos 1610 lacks the published benchmark results an Inno Score requires, so there is no Inno Score to compare — we don't rank chips on their spec sheet alone. The spec table below still shows every difference we track.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 1610

No decisive spec advantages — this side competes on price and preference.

Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 990

  • 14% higher Max clock: 2.73 GHz vs 2.4 GHz

General

General comparison: Samsung Exynos 1610 versus Samsung Exynos 990
SpecSamsung Exynos 1610Samsung Exynos 990
Announced20262020
Process—7 nm
TDP (typical)—10 W
Architecture—Armv8.2

CPU

CPU comparison: Samsung Exynos 1610 versus Samsung Exynos 990
SpecSamsung Exynos 1610Samsung Exynos 990
Cores88
Core configuration2 + 62x2.73 GHz Exynos M5 + 2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A76 + 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55
Max clock2.4 GHz2.73 GHz+14%

GPU

GPU comparison: Samsung Exynos 1610 versus Samsung Exynos 990
SpecSamsung Exynos 1610Samsung Exynos 990
GPUMali-G68Arm Mali-G77 MP11

Memory

Memory comparison: Samsung Exynos 1610 versus Samsung Exynos 990
SpecSamsung Exynos 1610Samsung Exynos 990
Memory type—LPDDR5-2750
Max bandwidth—44 GB/s

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: Samsung Exynos 1610 versus Samsung Exynos 990
SpecSamsung Exynos 1610Samsung Exynos 990
Modem—Exynos 5123 5G (external)
Wi-FiWi-Fi 5Wi-Fi 6
Bluetooth5.35.0

Media

Media comparison: Samsung Exynos 1610 versus Samsung Exynos 990
SpecSamsung Exynos 1610Samsung Exynos 990
Max display—WQHD+ @ 120Hz
Video capture—8K@30fps

Benchmarks

Benchmarks comparison: Samsung Exynos 1610 versus Samsung Exynos 990
SpecSamsung Exynos 1610Samsung Exynos 990
AnTuTu—500,000
Geekbench 6 (single)—900Top 63%
Geekbench 6 (multi)—2,650Top 56%
3DMark Wild Life Extreme—900Top 83%

Related comparisons

Try another matchup