Samsung Exynos 2400e vs Unisoc Tiger T612
49.9CPU20
47.8GPU—
66.7Benchmarks20
66.5Efficiency46.7
7 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 2400e1 spec wins — Unisoc Tiger T612
InnoReviews verdict
Samsung Exynos 2400e wins this mobile chipset face-off, 55.8 to 26.2, pulling ahead mainly in benchmarks (+47) and CPU (+30). Unisoc Tiger T612 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 2400e
- Stronger CPU score: 50 vs 20
- Stronger benchmarks score: 67 vs 20
- Stronger efficiency score: 67 vs 47
- 540% higher AnTuTu 10: 1,600,000 vs 250,000
- 388% higher Geekbench 6 (single): 2,050 vs 420
Reasons to pick the Unisoc Tiger T612
- 56% lower TDP (typical): 4 W vs 9 W
General
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 2400e | Unisoc Tiger T612 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024 | 2021 |
| Process | 4 nm+67% | 12 nm |
| TDP (typical) | 9 W | 4 W+56% |
| Architecture | Armv9.2 | Armv8.2 |
CPU
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 2400e | Unisoc Tiger T612 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 10+25% | 8 |
| Core configuration | 1x3.1 GHz Cortex-X4 + 2x2.9 GHz Cortex-A720 + 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A720 + 4x1.95 GHz Cortex-A520 | 2x1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 + 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 |
| Max clock | 3.1 GHz+72% | 1.8 GHz |
GPU
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 2400e | Unisoc Tiger T612 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Samsung Xclipse 940 | Arm Mali-G57 MP1 |
AI
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 2400e | Unisoc Tiger T612 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | Samsung NPU | — |
Memory
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 2400e | Unisoc Tiger T612 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR4X-1866 |
| Max bandwidth | — | 14.9 GB/s |
Connectivity
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 2400e | Unisoc Tiger T612 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | Integrated Exynos 5G modem | Integrated LTE Cat-7 |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 6E | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.0 |
Media
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 2400e | Unisoc Tiger T612 |
|---|---|---|
| Max display | QHD+ @ 120Hz | FHD+ @ 60Hz |
| Video capture | 8K@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 2400e | Unisoc Tiger T612 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu 10 | 1,600,000+540%Top 17% | 250,000Top 88% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 2,050+388%Top 18% | 420Top 84% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 6,400+327%Top 16% | 1,500Top 83% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 3,600Top 27% | — |
Related comparisons
Samsung Exynos 2400evs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2VSSamsung Exynos 2400evs MediaTek Dimensity 9200VSSamsung Exynos 2400evs Apple A16 BionicVSSamsung Exynos 2400evs MediaTek Dimensity 8400VSUnisoc Tiger T612vs MediaTek Helio G85VSUnisoc Tiger T612vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 439VSUnisoc Tiger T612vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 450VSUnisoc Tiger T612vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 460VS