Samsung Exynos 2500 vs Unisoc Tiger T760
57.2CPU22.8
54.3GPU—
74.2Benchmarks33.1
85.9AI—
79.6Efficiency54.9
7 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 25001 spec wins — Unisoc Tiger T760
InnoReviews verdict
Samsung Exynos 2500 wins this mobile chipset face-off, 66.1 to 33.4, pulling ahead mainly in benchmarks (+41) and CPU (+34). Unisoc Tiger T760 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 2500
- Stronger CPU score: 57 vs 23
- Stronger benchmarks score: 74 vs 33
- Stronger efficiency score: 80 vs 55
- 412% higher AnTuTu 10: 2,150,000 vs 420,000
- 332% higher Geekbench 6 (multi): 8,200 vs 1,900
Reasons to pick the Unisoc Tiger T760
- 37% lower TDP (typical): 5 W vs 8 W
General
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 2500 | Unisoc Tiger T760 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025 | 2022 |
| Process | 3 nm+50% | 6 nm |
| TDP (typical) | 8 W | 5 W+37% |
| Architecture | Armv9.2 | Armv8.2 |
CPU
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 2500 | Unisoc Tiger T760 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 10+25% | 8 |
| Core configuration | 1x3.3 GHz Cortex-X925 + 2x2.75 GHz Cortex-A725 + 5x2.36 GHz Cortex-A725 + 2x1.8 GHz Cortex-A520 | 4x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 + 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 |
| Max clock | 3.3 GHz+50% | 2.2 GHz |
GPU
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 2500 | Unisoc Tiger T760 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Samsung Xclipse 950 | Arm Mali-G57 MP4 |
AI
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 2500 | Unisoc Tiger T760 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | Samsung NPU | — |
| AI performance | 59 TOPS | — |
Memory
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 2500 | Unisoc Tiger T760 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR4X-2133 |
| Max bandwidth | — | 17.1 GB/s |
Connectivity
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 2500 | Unisoc Tiger T760 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | Integrated Exynos 5G modem | Integrated 5G (sub-6) |
| Wi-Fi | — | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | — | 5.2 |
Media
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 2500 | Unisoc Tiger T760 |
|---|---|---|
| Max display | — | FHD+ @ 120Hz |
| Video capture | 8K@30fps | 4K@30fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 2500 | Unisoc Tiger T760 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu 10 | 2,150,000+412%Top 8% | 420,000Top 70% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 2,300+283%Top 12% | 600Top 76% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 8,200+332%Top 9% | 1,900Top 72% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 4,400Top 17% | — |
Related comparisons
Samsung Exynos 2500vs Apple A18VSSamsung Exynos 2500vs Apple A18 ProVSSamsung Exynos 2500vs Apple A17 ProVSSamsung Exynos 2500vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3VSUnisoc Tiger T760vs MediaTek Dimensity 6100+VSUnisoc Tiger T760vs Qualcomm Snapdragon CVSUnisoc Tiger T760vs MediaTek Dimensity 810VSUnisoc Tiger T760vs MediaTek Dimensity 6080VS