Samsung Exynos 2500 vs Unisoc Tiger T612
57.2CPU20
54.3GPU—
74.2Benchmarks20
85.9AI—
79.6Efficiency46.7
7 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 25001 spec wins — Unisoc Tiger T612
InnoReviews verdict
Samsung Exynos 2500 wins this mobile chipset face-off, 66.1 to 26.2, pulling ahead mainly in benchmarks (+54) and CPU (+37). Unisoc Tiger T612 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 2500
- Stronger CPU score: 57 vs 20
- Stronger benchmarks score: 74 vs 20
- Stronger efficiency score: 80 vs 47
- 760% higher AnTuTu 10: 2,150,000 vs 250,000
- 448% higher Geekbench 6 (single): 2,300 vs 420
Reasons to pick the Unisoc Tiger T612
- 50% lower TDP (typical): 4 W vs 8 W
General
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 2500 | Unisoc Tiger T612 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025 | 2021 |
| Process | 3 nm+75% | 12 nm |
| TDP (typical) | 8 W | 4 W+50% |
| Architecture | Armv9.2 | Armv8.2 |
CPU
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 2500 | Unisoc Tiger T612 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 10+25% | 8 |
| Core configuration | 1x3.3 GHz Cortex-X925 + 2x2.75 GHz Cortex-A725 + 5x2.36 GHz Cortex-A725 + 2x1.8 GHz Cortex-A520 | 2x1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 + 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 |
| Max clock | 3.3 GHz+83% | 1.8 GHz |
GPU
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 2500 | Unisoc Tiger T612 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Samsung Xclipse 950 | Arm Mali-G57 MP1 |
AI
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 2500 | Unisoc Tiger T612 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | Samsung NPU | — |
| AI performance | 59 TOPS | — |
Memory
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 2500 | Unisoc Tiger T612 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR4X-1866 |
| Max bandwidth | — | 14.9 GB/s |
Connectivity
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 2500 | Unisoc Tiger T612 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | Integrated Exynos 5G modem | Integrated LTE Cat-7 |
| Wi-Fi | — | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | — | 5.0 |
Media
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 2500 | Unisoc Tiger T612 |
|---|---|---|
| Max display | — | FHD+ @ 60Hz |
| Video capture | 8K@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 2500 | Unisoc Tiger T612 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu 10 | 2,150,000+760%Top 8% | 250,000Top 88% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 2,300+448%Top 12% | 420Top 84% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 8,200+447%Top 9% | 1,500Top 83% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 4,400Top 17% | — |
Related comparisons
Samsung Exynos 2500vs Apple A18VSSamsung Exynos 2500vs Apple A18 ProVSSamsung Exynos 2500vs Apple A17 ProVSSamsung Exynos 2500vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3VSUnisoc Tiger T612vs MediaTek Helio G85VSUnisoc Tiger T612vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 439VSUnisoc Tiger T612vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 450VSUnisoc Tiger T612vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 460VS