Samsung Exynos 2600 vs Samsung Exynos 9611
72.6CPU21.6
77.4GPU—
81.1Benchmarks20
100Efficiencyspec-based44.2
5 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 26000 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 9611
InnoReviews verdict
Samsung Exynos 2600 wins this mobile chipset face-off, 80.4 to 26.3, pulling ahead mainly in benchmarks (+61) and CPU (+51). Samsung Exynos 9611 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 2600
- Stronger CPU score: 73 vs 22
- Stronger benchmarks score: 81 vs 20
- 766% higher Geekbench 6 (multi): 10,824 vs 1,250
- 756% higher Geekbench 6 (single): 2,995 vs 350
- 80% lower process: 2 nm vs 10 nm
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 9611
No decisive spec advantages — this side competes on price and preference.
General
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 2600 | Samsung Exynos 9611 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2026 | 2019 |
| Process | 2 nm+80% | 10 nm |
| TDP (typical) | — | 5 W |
| Architecture | Armv9.3 | Armv8 |
CPU
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 2600 | Samsung Exynos 9611 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 10+25% | 8 |
| Core configuration | 1x Arm C1-Ultra + 3x Arm C1-Pro (high-performance) + 6x Arm C1-Pro (high-efficiency) | 4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A73 + 4x1.7 GHz Cortex-A53 |
| Max clock | — | 2.3 GHz |
GPU
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 2600 | Samsung Exynos 9611 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Samsung Xclipse 960 | Arm Mali-G72 MP3 |
AI
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 2600 | Samsung Exynos 9611 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | Samsung NPU | — |
Memory
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 2600 | Samsung Exynos 9611 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | — | LPDDR4X-1866 |
| Max bandwidth | — | 14.9 GB/s |
Connectivity
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 2600 | Samsung Exynos 9611 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | — | Integrated LTE Cat-12 |
| Wi-Fi | — | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | — | 5.0 |
Media
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 2600 | Samsung Exynos 9611 |
|---|---|---|
| Max display | — | FHD+ @ 60Hz |
| Video capture | — | 4K@30fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 2600 | Samsung Exynos 9611 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTuDifferent AnTuTu versions — not compared | 2,827,538Top 12% | 215,000 |
| AnTuTu 11 (CPU) | 947,776Top 9% | — |
| AnTuTu 11 (GPU) | 1,052,625Top 12% | — |
| AnTuTu 11 (Memory) | 347,409Top 23% | — |
| AnTuTu 11 (UX) | 479,728Top 25% | — |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 2,995+756%Top 9% | 350Top 90% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 10,824+766%Top 4% | 1,250Top 91% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 7,230Top 7% | — |
Related comparisons
Samsung Exynos 2600vs MediaTek Dimensity 9500VSSamsung Exynos 2600vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5VSSamsung Exynos 2600vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 EliteVSSamsung Exynos 2600vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5VSSamsung Exynos 9611vs MediaTek Helio G88VSSamsung Exynos 9611vs MediaTek Helio G85VSSamsung Exynos 9611vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 439VSSamsung Exynos 9611vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 450VS

