Samsung Exynos 2600 vs Unisoc Tiger T612
72.6CPU20
77.4GPU—
81.1Benchmarks20
100Efficiencyspec-based46.7
5 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 26000 spec wins — Unisoc Tiger T612
InnoReviews verdict
Samsung Exynos 2600 wins this mobile chipset face-off, 80.4 to 26.2, pulling ahead mainly in benchmarks (+61) and CPU (+53). Unisoc Tiger T612 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 2600
- Stronger CPU score: 73 vs 20
- Stronger benchmarks score: 81 vs 20
- 622% higher Geekbench 6 (multi): 10,824 vs 1,500
- 613% higher Geekbench 6 (single): 2,995 vs 420
- 83% lower process: 2 nm vs 12 nm
Reasons to pick the Unisoc Tiger T612
No decisive spec advantages — this side competes on price and preference.
General
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 2600 | Unisoc Tiger T612 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2026 | 2021 |
| Process | 2 nm+83% | 12 nm |
| TDP (typical) | — | 4 W |
| Architecture | Armv9.3 | Armv8.2 |
CPU
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 2600 | Unisoc Tiger T612 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 10+25% | 8 |
| Core configuration | 1x Arm C1-Ultra + 3x Arm C1-Pro (high-performance) + 6x Arm C1-Pro (high-efficiency) | 2x1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 + 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 |
| Max clock | — | 1.8 GHz |
GPU
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 2600 | Unisoc Tiger T612 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Samsung Xclipse 960 | Arm Mali-G57 MP1 |
AI
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 2600 | Unisoc Tiger T612 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | Samsung NPU | — |
Memory
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 2600 | Unisoc Tiger T612 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | — | LPDDR4X-1866 |
| Max bandwidth | — | 14.9 GB/s |
Connectivity
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 2600 | Unisoc Tiger T612 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | — | Integrated LTE Cat-7 |
| Wi-Fi | — | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | — | 5.0 |
Media
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 2600 | Unisoc Tiger T612 |
|---|---|---|
| Max display | — | FHD+ @ 60Hz |
| Video capture | — | 1080p@30fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 2600 | Unisoc Tiger T612 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTuDifferent AnTuTu versions — not compared | 2,827,538Top 12% | 250,000 |
| AnTuTu 11 (CPU) | 947,776Top 9% | — |
| AnTuTu 11 (GPU) | 1,052,625Top 12% | — |
| AnTuTu 11 (Memory) | 347,409Top 23% | — |
| AnTuTu 11 (UX) | 479,728Top 25% | — |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 2,995+613%Top 9% | 420Top 85% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 10,824+622%Top 4% | 1,500Top 84% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 7,230Top 7% | — |
Related comparisons
Samsung Exynos 2600vs MediaTek Dimensity 9500VSSamsung Exynos 2600vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5VSSamsung Exynos 2600vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 EliteVSSamsung Exynos 2600vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5VSUnisoc Tiger T612vs MediaTek Helio G85VSUnisoc Tiger T612vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 439VSUnisoc Tiger T612vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 450VSUnisoc Tiger T612vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 460VS