Skip to content
InnoReviews

Samsung Exynos 850 vs Unisoc T7250

Samsung Exynos 850
26.2Inno Score
VS
Unisoc T7250
—Inno Score
20CPU20
—GPU55
20Benchmarks—
46.7Efficiencyspec-based20
2 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 8502 spec wins — Unisoc T7250

InnoReviews verdict

No overall winner yet: Unisoc T7250 lacks the published benchmark results an Inno Score requires, so there is no Inno Score to compare — we don't rank chips on their spec sheet alone. The spec table below still shows every difference we track.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 850

  • 33% lower process: 8 nm vs 12 nm
  • 11% higher Max clock: 2 GHz vs 1.8 GHz

Reasons to pick the Unisoc T7250

  • 16% higher Max bandwidth: 14.9 GB/s vs 12.8 GB/s

General

General comparison: Samsung Exynos 850 versus Unisoc T7250
SpecSamsung Exynos 850Unisoc T7250
Announced20202024
Process8 nm+33%12 nm
TDP (typical)4 W—
ArchitectureArmv8.2Armv8.2

CPU

CPU comparison: Samsung Exynos 850 versus Unisoc T7250
SpecSamsung Exynos 850Unisoc T7250
Cores88
Core configuration8x2.0 GHz Cortex-A552x1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 + 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55
Max clock2 GHz+11%1.8 GHz

GPU

GPU comparison: Samsung Exynos 850 versus Unisoc T7250
SpecSamsung Exynos 850Unisoc T7250
GPUArm Mali-G52 MP1Arm Mali-G57
GPU clock—850 MHz

Memory

Memory comparison: Samsung Exynos 850 versus Unisoc T7250
SpecSamsung Exynos 850Unisoc T7250
Memory typeLPDDR4X-1600LPDDR4X-1866
Max bandwidth12.8 GB/s14.9 GB/s+16%

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: Samsung Exynos 850 versus Unisoc T7250
SpecSamsung Exynos 850Unisoc T7250
ModemIntegrated LTE Cat-7Integrated LTE Cat-7 (DL) / Cat-13 (UL)
Wi-FiWi-Fi 5Wi-Fi 5
Bluetooth5.05.2

Media

Media comparison: Samsung Exynos 850 versus Unisoc T7250
SpecSamsung Exynos 850Unisoc T7250
Max displayFHD+ @ 60HzFHD+ @ 60Hz / HD+ @ 120Hz
Video capture1080p@30fps1080p@60fps

Benchmarks

Benchmarks comparison: Samsung Exynos 850 versus Unisoc T7250
SpecSamsung Exynos 850Unisoc T7250
AnTuTu180,000—
Geekbench 6 (single)170Bottom 5%—
Geekbench 6 (multi)600Bottom 4%—

Related comparisons

Try another matchup