Skip to content
InnoReviews

Samsung Exynos 850 vs Unisoc T8200

Samsung Exynos 850
26.2Inno Score
VS
Unisoc T8200
—Inno Score
20CPU28
—GPU55
20Benchmarks—
46.7Efficiencyspec-based36
0 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 8503 spec wins — Unisoc T8200

InnoReviews verdict

No overall winner yet: Unisoc T8200 lacks the published benchmark results an Inno Score requires, so there is no Inno Score to compare — we don't rank chips on their spec sheet alone. The spec table below still shows every difference we track.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 850

No decisive spec advantages — this side competes on price and preference.

Reasons to pick the Unisoc T8200

  • Stronger CPU score: 28 vs 20
  • 25% lower process: 6 nm vs 8 nm
  • 15% higher Max clock: 2.3 GHz vs 2 GHz

General

General comparison: Samsung Exynos 850 versus Unisoc T8200
SpecSamsung Exynos 850Unisoc T8200
Announced20202025
Process8 nm6 nm+25%
TDP (typical)4 W—
ArchitectureArmv8.2Armv8.2

CPU

CPU comparison: Samsung Exynos 850 versus Unisoc T8200
SpecSamsung Exynos 850Unisoc T8200
Cores88
Core configuration8x2.0 GHz Cortex-A552x2.3 GHz Cortex-A76 + 6x2.1 GHz Cortex-A55
Max clock2 GHz2.3 GHz+15%

GPU

GPU comparison: Samsung Exynos 850 versus Unisoc T8200
SpecSamsung Exynos 850Unisoc T8200
GPUArm Mali-G52 MP1Arm Mali-G57 MC2
GPU clock—850 MHz

Memory

Memory comparison: Samsung Exynos 850 versus Unisoc T8200
SpecSamsung Exynos 850Unisoc T8200
Memory typeLPDDR4X-1600LPDDR4X-2133
Max bandwidth12.8 GB/s—

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: Samsung Exynos 850 versus Unisoc T8200
SpecSamsung Exynos 850Unisoc T8200
ModemIntegrated LTE Cat-7Integrated 5G (SA/NSA)
Wi-FiWi-Fi 5Wi-Fi 6 (1x1, optional)
Bluetooth5.05.4

Media

Media comparison: Samsung Exynos 850 versus Unisoc T8200
SpecSamsung Exynos 850Unisoc T8200
Max displayFHD+ @ 60HzFHD+ @ 120Hz
Video capture1080p@30fps4K@30fps

Benchmarks

Benchmarks comparison: Samsung Exynos 850 versus Unisoc T8200
SpecSamsung Exynos 850Unisoc T8200
AnTuTu180,000—
Geekbench 6 (single)170Bottom 5%—
Geekbench 6 (multi)600Bottom 4%—

Related comparisons

Try another matchup