Skip to content
InnoReviews

Samsung Exynos 9610 vs Unisoc T610

Samsung Exynos 9610
—Inno Score
VS
Unisoc T610
20.6Inno Score
28CPU20
—GPU21.6
20Efficiencyspec-based20
2 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 96101 spec wins — Unisoc T610

InnoReviews verdict

No overall winner yet: Samsung Exynos 9610 lacks the published benchmark results an Inno Score requires, so there is no Inno Score to compare — we don't rank chips on their spec sheet alone. The spec table below still shows every difference we track.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 9610

  • Stronger CPU score: 28 vs 20
  • 28% higher Max clock: 2.3 GHz vs 1.8 GHz
  • 17% lower process: 10 nm vs 12 nm

Reasons to pick the Unisoc T610

No decisive spec advantages — this side competes on price and preference.

General

General comparison: Samsung Exynos 9610 versus Unisoc T610
SpecSamsung Exynos 9610Unisoc T610
Announced20182021
Process10 nm+17%12 nm
ArchitectureArmv8Armv8.2

CPU

CPU comparison: Samsung Exynos 9610 versus Unisoc T610
SpecSamsung Exynos 9610Unisoc T610
Cores88
Core configuration4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A73 + 4x1.7 GHz Cortex-A532x1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 + 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55
Max clock2.3 GHz+28%1.8 GHz

GPU

GPU comparison: Samsung Exynos 9610 versus Unisoc T610
SpecSamsung Exynos 9610Unisoc T610
GPUArm Mali-G72 MP3Arm Mali-G52 MP2
GPU clock—614 MHz

Memory

Memory comparison: Samsung Exynos 9610 versus Unisoc T610
SpecSamsung Exynos 9610Unisoc T610
Memory typeLPDDR4XLPDDR4X-1600 / LPDDR3-933

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: Samsung Exynos 9610 versus Unisoc T610
SpecSamsung Exynos 9610Unisoc T610
ModemIntegrated LTE Cat-12Integrated LTE Cat-7
Max download0.6 Gbps—
Wi-FiWi-Fi 5Wi-Fi 5
Bluetooth5.05.0

Media

Media comparison: Samsung Exynos 9610 versus Unisoc T610
SpecSamsung Exynos 9610Unisoc T610
Max displayWQXGA (2560x1600)FHD+ (2400x1080)
Video capture4K@120fps1080p@60fps

Benchmarks

Benchmarks comparison: Samsung Exynos 9610 versus Unisoc T610
SpecSamsung Exynos 9610Unisoc T610
Geekbench 6 (single)—417Bottom 12%
Geekbench 6 (multi)—1,361Bottom 13%
3DMark Wild Life Extreme—135Bottom 3%

Related comparisons

Try another matchup