Skip to content
InnoReviews

Samsung Exynos 9610 vs Unisoc T616

Samsung Exynos 9610
—Inno Score
VS
U
21.3Inno Score
28CPU20.1
—GPU23.6
20Efficiencyspec-based20
2 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 96101 spec wins — Unisoc T616

InnoReviews verdict

No overall winner yet: Samsung Exynos 9610 lacks the published benchmark results an Inno Score requires, so there is no Inno Score to compare — we don't rank chips on their spec sheet alone. The spec table below still shows every difference we track.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 9610

  • Stronger CPU score: 28 vs 20
  • 17% lower process: 10 nm vs 12 nm
  • 15% higher Max clock: 2.3 GHz vs 2 GHz

Reasons to pick the Unisoc T616

No decisive spec advantages — this side competes on price and preference.

General

General comparison: Samsung Exynos 9610 versus Unisoc T616
SpecSamsung Exynos 9610Unisoc T616
Announced20182022
Process10 nm+17%12 nm
ArchitectureArmv8Armv8.2

CPU

CPU comparison: Samsung Exynos 9610 versus Unisoc T616
SpecSamsung Exynos 9610Unisoc T616
Cores88
Core configuration4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A73 + 4x1.7 GHz Cortex-A532x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 + 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55
Max clock2.3 GHz+15%2 GHz

GPU

GPU comparison: Samsung Exynos 9610 versus Unisoc T616
SpecSamsung Exynos 9610Unisoc T616
GPUArm Mali-G72 MP3Arm Mali-G57 MP1
GPU clock—750 MHz

Memory

Memory comparison: Samsung Exynos 9610 versus Unisoc T616
SpecSamsung Exynos 9610Unisoc T616
Memory typeLPDDR4XLPDDR4X-1866

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: Samsung Exynos 9610 versus Unisoc T616
SpecSamsung Exynos 9610Unisoc T616
ModemIntegrated LTE Cat-12Integrated LTE Cat-7
Max download0.6 Gbps—
Wi-FiWi-Fi 5Wi-Fi 5
Bluetooth5.05.0

Media

Media comparison: Samsung Exynos 9610 versus Unisoc T616
SpecSamsung Exynos 9610Unisoc T616
Max displayWQXGA (2560x1600)FHD+ @ 60Hz / HD+ @ 90Hz
Video capture4K@120fps1080p@60fps

Benchmarks

Benchmarks comparison: Samsung Exynos 9610 versus Unisoc T616
SpecSamsung Exynos 9610Unisoc T616
Geekbench 6 (single)—435Bottom 16%
Geekbench 6 (multi)—1,553Bottom 17%
3DMark Wild Life Extreme—130Bottom 2%

Related comparisons

Samsung Exynos 9610vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 712VSSamsung Exynos 9610vs Samsung Exynos 9611VSSamsung Exynos 9610vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 765GVSSamsung Exynos 9610vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730GVSUnisoc T616vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 678VSUnisoc T616vs MediaTek Dimensity 6020VSUnisoc T616vs Unisoc T610VSUnisoc T616vs Unisoc T620VS

Try another matchup