Skip to content
InnoReviews

Samsung Exynos 9610 vs Unisoc T765

Samsung Exynos 9610
—Inno Score
VS
Unisoc T765
—Inno Score
28CPU24.5
—GPU55
20Efficiencyspec-based36
0 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 96102 spec wins — Unisoc T765

InnoReviews verdict

No overall winner yet: Samsung Exynos 9610 and Unisoc T765 lack the published benchmark results an Inno Score requires, so there is no Inno Score to compare — we don't rank chips on their spec sheet alone. The spec table below still shows every difference we track.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 9610

  • Stronger CPU score: 28 vs 25

Reasons to pick the Unisoc T765

  • 40% lower process: 6 nm vs 10 nm

General

General comparison: Samsung Exynos 9610 versus Unisoc T765
SpecSamsung Exynos 9610Unisoc T765
Announced20182023
Process10 nm6 nm+40%
ArchitectureArmv8Armv8.2

CPU

CPU comparison: Samsung Exynos 9610 versus Unisoc T765
SpecSamsung Exynos 9610Unisoc T765
Cores88
Core configuration4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A73 + 4x1.7 GHz Cortex-A532x2.3 GHz Cortex-A76 + 6x2.1 GHz Cortex-A55
Max clock2.3 GHz2.3 GHz

GPU

GPU comparison: Samsung Exynos 9610 versus Unisoc T765
SpecSamsung Exynos 9610Unisoc T765
GPUArm Mali-G72 MP3Arm Mali-G57 MC2
GPU clock—850 MHz

Memory

Memory comparison: Samsung Exynos 9610 versus Unisoc T765
SpecSamsung Exynos 9610Unisoc T765
Memory typeLPDDR4XLPDDR4X-2133

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: Samsung Exynos 9610 versus Unisoc T765
SpecSamsung Exynos 9610Unisoc T765
ModemIntegrated LTE Cat-12Integrated 5G (SA/NSA), LTE Cat-15 (DL) / Cat-18 (UL)
Max download0.6 Gbps—
Wi-FiWi-Fi 5Wi-Fi 5
Bluetooth5.05.0

Media

Media comparison: Samsung Exynos 9610 versus Unisoc T765
SpecSamsung Exynos 9610Unisoc T765
Max displayWQXGA (2560x1600)FHD+ @ 120Hz
Video capture4K@120fps4K@30fps

Benchmarks

Benchmarks comparison: Samsung Exynos 9610 versus Unisoc T765
SpecSamsung Exynos 9610Unisoc T765
Geekbench 6 (single)—736Bottom 29%
Geekbench 6 (multi)—1,925Bottom 27%

Related comparisons

Try another matchup