Samsung Exynos 9610 vs Xiaomi XRING O1
28CPU66.2
—GPU69.9
—AIspec-based78.1
20Efficiencyspec-based84
0 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 96104 spec wins — Xiaomi XRING O1
InnoReviews verdict
No overall winner yet: Samsung Exynos 9610 lacks the published benchmark results an Inno Score requires, so there is no Inno Score to compare — we don't rank chips on their spec sheet alone. The spec table below still shows every difference we track.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 9610
No decisive spec advantages — this side competes on price and preference.
Reasons to pick the Xiaomi XRING O1
- Stronger CPU score: 66 vs 28
- 70% lower process: 3 nm vs 10 nm
- 70% higher Max clock: 3.9 GHz vs 2.3 GHz
- 25% higher cores: 10 vs 8
General
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 9610 | Xiaomi XRING O1 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2018 | 2025 |
| Process | 10 nm | 3 nm+70% |
| Architecture | Armv8 | — |
CPU
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 9610 | Xiaomi XRING O1 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 8 | 10+25% |
| Core configuration | 4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A73 + 4x1.7 GHz Cortex-A53 | 2x3.9 GHz Cortex-X925 + 4x3.4 GHz Cortex-A725 + 2x1.9 GHz Cortex-A725 + 2x1.8 GHz Cortex-A520 |
| Max clock | 2.3 GHz | 3.9 GHz+70% |
GPU
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 9610 | Xiaomi XRING O1 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Arm Mali-G72 MP3 | Arm Immortalis-G925 MC16 |
AI
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 9610 | Xiaomi XRING O1 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | — | Xiaomi NPU (6-core, self-developed) |
| AI performance | — | 44 TOPS |
Memory
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 9610 | Xiaomi XRING O1 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR5T |
Connectivity
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 9610 | Xiaomi XRING O1 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | Integrated LTE Cat-12 | External (MediaTek T800) |
| Max download | 0.6 Gbps | — |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.0 | 5.4 |
Media
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 9610 | Xiaomi XRING O1 |
|---|---|---|
| Max display | WQXGA (2560x1600) | — |
| Video capture | 4K@120fps | — |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 9610 | Xiaomi XRING O1 |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench 6 (single) | — | 2,790Top 10% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | — | 8,970Top 8% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 6,311Top 8% |
Related comparisons
Samsung Exynos 9610vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 712VSSamsung Exynos 9610vs Samsung Exynos 9611VSSamsung Exynos 9610vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 765GVSSamsung Exynos 9610vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730GVSXiaomi XRING O1vs MediaTek Dimensity 9400+VSXiaomi XRING O1vs MediaTek Dimensity 9500sVSXiaomi XRING O1vs Apple A19 ProVSXiaomi XRING O1vs MediaTek Dimensity 9400VS

