Skip to content
InnoReviews

Samsung Exynos 9611 vs Unisoc T7225

Samsung Exynos 9611
26.3Inno Score
VS
Unisoc T7225
—Inno Score
21.6CPU20
—GPU35
20Benchmarks—
44.2Efficiencyspec-based20
2 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 96111 spec wins — Unisoc T7225

InnoReviews verdict

No overall winner yet: Unisoc T7225 lacks the published benchmark results an Inno Score requires, so there is no Inno Score to compare — we don't rank chips on their spec sheet alone. The spec table below still shows every difference we track.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 9611

  • 28% higher Max clock: 2.3 GHz vs 1.8 GHz
  • 17% lower process: 10 nm vs 12 nm

Reasons to pick the Unisoc T7225

No decisive spec advantages — this side competes on price and preference.

General

General comparison: Samsung Exynos 9611 versus Unisoc T7225
SpecSamsung Exynos 9611Unisoc T7225
Announced20192025
Process10 nm+17%12 nm
TDP (typical)5 W—
ArchitectureArmv8Armv8.2

CPU

CPU comparison: Samsung Exynos 9611 versus Unisoc T7225
SpecSamsung Exynos 9611Unisoc T7225
Cores88
Core configuration4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A73 + 4x1.7 GHz Cortex-A532x1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 + 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55
Max clock2.3 GHz+28%1.8 GHz

GPU

GPU comparison: Samsung Exynos 9611 versus Unisoc T7225
SpecSamsung Exynos 9611Unisoc T7225
GPUArm Mali-G72 MP3Arm Mali-G57 MP1
GPU clock—650 MHz

Memory

Memory comparison: Samsung Exynos 9611 versus Unisoc T7225
SpecSamsung Exynos 9611Unisoc T7225
Memory typeLPDDR4X-1866LPDDR4X-1600
Max bandwidth14.9 GB/s—

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: Samsung Exynos 9611 versus Unisoc T7225
SpecSamsung Exynos 9611Unisoc T7225
ModemIntegrated LTE Cat-12Integrated LTE Cat-7
Wi-FiWi-Fi 5Wi-Fi 5
Bluetooth5.05.2

Media

Media comparison: Samsung Exynos 9611 versus Unisoc T7225
SpecSamsung Exynos 9611Unisoc T7225
Max displayFHD+ @ 60HzFHD+ @ 60Hz / HD+ @ 90Hz
Video capture4K@30fps1080p@60fps

Benchmarks

Benchmarks comparison: Samsung Exynos 9611 versus Unisoc T7225
SpecSamsung Exynos 9611Unisoc T7225
AnTuTu215,000—
Geekbench 6 (single)350Bottom 10%—
Geekbench 6 (multi)1,250Bottom 9%—

Related comparisons

Samsung Exynos 9611vs MediaTek Dimensity 6360VSSamsung Exynos 9611vs MediaTek Helio G88VSSamsung Exynos 9611vs MediaTek Helio G85VSSamsung Exynos 9611vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 439VSUnisoc T7225vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4s Gen 2VSUnisoc T7225vs MediaTek Helio G81VSUnisoc T7225vs MediaTek Helio G91VSUnisoc T7225vs Huawei Kirin 8020VS

Try another matchup