Skip to content
InnoReviews

Samsung Exynos 9611 vs Unisoc T7300

Samsung Exynos 9611
26.3Inno Score
VS
Unisoc T7300
—Inno Score
21.6CPU25.3
—GPU65
20Benchmarks—
44.2Efficiencyspec-based36
1 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 96112 spec wins — Unisoc T7300

InnoReviews verdict

No overall winner yet: Unisoc T7300 lacks the published benchmark results an Inno Score requires, so there is no Inno Score to compare — we don't rank chips on their spec sheet alone. The spec table below still shows every difference we track.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 9611

No decisive spec advantages — this side competes on price and preference.

Reasons to pick the Unisoc T7300

  • Stronger CPU score: 25 vs 22
  • 40% lower process: 6 nm vs 10 nm

General

General comparison: Samsung Exynos 9611 versus Unisoc T7300
SpecSamsung Exynos 9611Unisoc T7300
Announced20192025
Process10 nm6 nm+40%
TDP (typical)5 W—
ArchitectureArmv8Armv8.2

CPU

CPU comparison: Samsung Exynos 9611 versus Unisoc T7300
SpecSamsung Exynos 9611Unisoc T7300
Cores88
Core configuration4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A73 + 4x1.7 GHz Cortex-A532x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 + 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55
Max clock2.3 GHz+5%2.2 GHz

GPU

GPU comparison: Samsung Exynos 9611 versus Unisoc T7300
SpecSamsung Exynos 9611Unisoc T7300
GPUArm Mali-G72 MP3Arm Mali-G57 MC2
GPU clock—950 MHz

Memory

Memory comparison: Samsung Exynos 9611 versus Unisoc T7300
SpecSamsung Exynos 9611Unisoc T7300
Memory typeLPDDR4X-1866LPDDR4X-2133
Max bandwidth14.9 GB/s—

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: Samsung Exynos 9611 versus Unisoc T7300
SpecSamsung Exynos 9611Unisoc T7300
ModemIntegrated LTE Cat-12Integrated LTE Cat-7 (DL) / Cat-13 (UL)
Wi-FiWi-Fi 5Wi-Fi 5 (Wi-Fi 6 optional)
Bluetooth5.05.4

Media

Media comparison: Samsung Exynos 9611 versus Unisoc T7300
SpecSamsung Exynos 9611Unisoc T7300
Max displayFHD+ @ 60HzFHD+ @ 120Hz
Video capture4K@30fps2K@30fps

Benchmarks

Benchmarks comparison: Samsung Exynos 9611 versus Unisoc T7300
SpecSamsung Exynos 9611Unisoc T7300
AnTuTu215,000—
Geekbench 6 (single)350Bottom 10%—
Geekbench 6 (multi)1,250Bottom 9%—

Related comparisons

Try another matchup