Skip to content
InnoReviews

Samsung Exynos 9820 vs Unisoc T7225

Samsung Exynos 9820
—Inno Score
VS
Unisoc T7225
—Inno Score
39.5CPU20
—GPU35
20Efficiencyspec-based20
2 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 98201 spec wins — Unisoc T7225

InnoReviews verdict

No overall winner yet: Samsung Exynos 9820 and Unisoc T7225 lack the published benchmark results an Inno Score requires, so there is no Inno Score to compare — we don't rank chips on their spec sheet alone. The spec table below still shows every difference we track.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 9820

  • Stronger CPU score: 40 vs 20
  • 52% higher Max clock: 2.73 GHz vs 1.8 GHz
  • 33% lower process: 8 nm vs 12 nm

Reasons to pick the Unisoc T7225

No decisive spec advantages — this side competes on price and preference.

General

General comparison: Samsung Exynos 9820 versus Unisoc T7225
SpecSamsung Exynos 9820Unisoc T7225
Announced20182025
Process8 nm+33%12 nm
Architecture—Armv8.2

CPU

CPU comparison: Samsung Exynos 9820 versus Unisoc T7225
SpecSamsung Exynos 9820Unisoc T7225
Cores88
Core configuration2x2.73 GHz Mongoose M4 + 2x2.31 GHz Cortex-A75 + 4x1.95 GHz Cortex-A552x1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 + 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55
Max clock2.73 GHz+52%1.8 GHz

GPU

GPU comparison: Samsung Exynos 9820 versus Unisoc T7225
SpecSamsung Exynos 9820Unisoc T7225
GPUArm Mali-G76 MP12Arm Mali-G57 MP1
GPU clock—650 MHz

AI

AI comparison: Samsung Exynos 9820 versus Unisoc T7225
SpecSamsung Exynos 9820Unisoc T7225
NPUSamsung NPU—

Memory

Memory comparison: Samsung Exynos 9820 versus Unisoc T7225
SpecSamsung Exynos 9820Unisoc T7225
Memory typeLPDDR4XLPDDR4X-1600

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: Samsung Exynos 9820 versus Unisoc T7225
SpecSamsung Exynos 9820Unisoc T7225
ModemIntegrated LTE Cat-20Integrated LTE Cat-7
Max download2 Gbps—
Wi-Fi—Wi-Fi 5
Bluetooth—5.2

Media

Media comparison: Samsung Exynos 9820 versus Unisoc T7225
SpecSamsung Exynos 9820Unisoc T7225
Max displayWQUXGA (3840x2400)FHD+ @ 60Hz / HD+ @ 90Hz
Video capture8K@30fps1080p@60fps

Related comparisons

Try another matchup