Samsung Exynos 9820 vs Unisoc Tiger T612
39.5CPU20
—Benchmarks20
20Efficiencyspec-based46.7
2 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 98201 spec wins — Unisoc Tiger T612
InnoReviews verdict
No overall winner yet: Samsung Exynos 9820 lacks the published benchmark results an Inno Score requires, so there is no Inno Score to compare — we don't rank chips on their spec sheet alone. The spec table below still shows every difference we track.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 9820
- Stronger CPU score: 40 vs 20
- 52% higher Max clock: 2.73 GHz vs 1.8 GHz
- 33% lower process: 8 nm vs 12 nm
Reasons to pick the Unisoc Tiger T612
No decisive spec advantages — this side competes on price and preference.
General
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 9820 | Unisoc Tiger T612 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2018 | 2021 |
| Process | 8 nm+33% | 12 nm |
| TDP (typical) | — | 4 W |
| Architecture | — | Armv8.2 |
CPU
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 9820 | Unisoc Tiger T612 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 8 | 8 |
| Core configuration | 2x2.73 GHz Mongoose M4 + 2x2.31 GHz Cortex-A75 + 4x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55 | 2x1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 + 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 |
| Max clock | 2.73 GHz+52% | 1.8 GHz |
GPU
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 9820 | Unisoc Tiger T612 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Arm Mali-G76 MP12 | Arm Mali-G57 MP1 |
AI
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 9820 | Unisoc Tiger T612 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | Samsung NPU | — |
Memory
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 9820 | Unisoc Tiger T612 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X-1866 |
| Max bandwidth | — | 14.9 GB/s |
Connectivity
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 9820 | Unisoc Tiger T612 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | Integrated LTE Cat-20 | Integrated LTE Cat-7 |
| Max download | 2 Gbps | — |
| Wi-Fi | — | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | — | 5.0 |
Media
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 9820 | Unisoc Tiger T612 |
|---|---|---|
| Max display | WQUXGA (3840x2400) | FHD+ @ 60Hz |
| Video capture | 8K@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 9820 | Unisoc Tiger T612 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu | — | 250,000 |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | — | 420Bottom 13% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | — | 1,500Bottom 16% |
Related comparisons
Samsung Exynos 9820vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865VSSamsung Exynos 9820vs Huawei Kirin 990 5GVSSamsung Exynos 9820vs Samsung Exynos 990VSSamsung Exynos 9820vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 765GVSUnisoc Tiger T612vs MediaTek Helio G85VSUnisoc Tiger T612vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 439VSUnisoc Tiger T612vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 450VSUnisoc Tiger T612vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 460VS