Skip to content
InnoReviews

Samsung Exynos 990 vs Unisoc T7225

Samsung Exynos 990
30.8Inno Score
VS
Unisoc T7225
—Inno Score
29.8CPU20
25.7GPU35
37.4Benchmarks—
32.1Efficiencyspec-based20
2 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 9901 spec wins — Unisoc T7225

InnoReviews verdict

No overall winner yet: Unisoc T7225 lacks the published benchmark results an Inno Score requires, so there is no Inno Score to compare — we don't rank chips on their spec sheet alone. The spec table below still shows every difference we track.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 990

  • Stronger CPU score: 30 vs 20
  • 52% higher Max clock: 2.73 GHz vs 1.8 GHz
  • 42% lower process: 7 nm vs 12 nm

Reasons to pick the Unisoc T7225

  • Stronger GPU score: 35 vs 26

General

General comparison: Samsung Exynos 990 versus Unisoc T7225
SpecSamsung Exynos 990Unisoc T7225
Announced20202025
Process7 nm+42%12 nm
TDP (typical)10 W—
ArchitectureArmv8.2Armv8.2

CPU

CPU comparison: Samsung Exynos 990 versus Unisoc T7225
SpecSamsung Exynos 990Unisoc T7225
Cores88
Core configuration2x2.73 GHz Exynos M5 + 2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A76 + 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A552x1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 + 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55
Max clock2.73 GHz+52%1.8 GHz

GPU

GPU comparison: Samsung Exynos 990 versus Unisoc T7225
SpecSamsung Exynos 990Unisoc T7225
GPUArm Mali-G77 MP11Arm Mali-G57 MP1
GPU clock—650 MHz

Memory

Memory comparison: Samsung Exynos 990 versus Unisoc T7225
SpecSamsung Exynos 990Unisoc T7225
Memory typeLPDDR5-2750LPDDR4X-1600
Max bandwidth44 GB/s—

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: Samsung Exynos 990 versus Unisoc T7225
SpecSamsung Exynos 990Unisoc T7225
ModemExynos 5123 5G (external)Integrated LTE Cat-7
Wi-FiWi-Fi 6Wi-Fi 5
Bluetooth5.05.2

Media

Media comparison: Samsung Exynos 990 versus Unisoc T7225
SpecSamsung Exynos 990Unisoc T7225
Max displayWQHD+ @ 120HzFHD+ @ 60Hz / HD+ @ 90Hz
Video capture8K@30fps1080p@60fps

Benchmarks

Benchmarks comparison: Samsung Exynos 990 versus Unisoc T7225
SpecSamsung Exynos 990Unisoc T7225
AnTuTu500,000—
Geekbench 6 (single)900Bottom 38%—
Geekbench 6 (multi)2,650Bottom 46%—
3DMark Wild Life Extreme900Bottom 32%—

Related comparisons

Try another matchup