Skip to content
InnoReviews

Unisoc SC9863A vs Unisoc T7300

Unisoc SC9863A
25.6Inno Score
VS
Unisoc T7300
—Inno Score
20CPU25.3
—GPU65
20Benchmarks—
44.2Efficiencyspec-based36
0 spec wins — Unisoc SC9863A3 spec wins — Unisoc T7300

InnoReviews verdict

No overall winner yet: Unisoc T7300 lacks the published benchmark results an Inno Score requires, so there is no Inno Score to compare — we don't rank chips on their spec sheet alone. The spec table below still shows every difference we track.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the Unisoc SC9863A

No decisive spec advantages — this side competes on price and preference.

Reasons to pick the Unisoc T7300

  • Stronger CPU score: 25 vs 20
  • 79% lower process: 6 nm vs 28 nm
  • 38% higher Max clock: 2.2 GHz vs 1.6 GHz

General

General comparison: Unisoc SC9863A versus Unisoc T7300
SpecUnisoc SC9863AUnisoc T7300
Announced20192025
Process28 nm6 nm+79%
TDP (typical)5 W—
ArchitectureArmv8.2Armv8.2

CPU

CPU comparison: Unisoc SC9863A versus Unisoc T7300
SpecUnisoc SC9863AUnisoc T7300
Cores88
Core configuration4x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55 + 4x1.2 GHz Cortex-A552x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 + 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55
Max clock1.6 GHz2.2 GHz+38%

GPU

GPU comparison: Unisoc SC9863A versus Unisoc T7300
SpecUnisoc SC9863AUnisoc T7300
GPUIMG PowerVR GE8322Arm Mali-G57 MC2
GPU clock—950 MHz

Memory

Memory comparison: Unisoc SC9863A versus Unisoc T7300
SpecUnisoc SC9863AUnisoc T7300
Memory typeLPDDR3-933LPDDR4X-2133
Max bandwidth7.5 GB/s—

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: Unisoc SC9863A versus Unisoc T7300
SpecUnisoc SC9863AUnisoc T7300
ModemIntegrated LTE Cat-4Integrated LTE Cat-7 (DL) / Cat-13 (UL)
Wi-FiWi-Fi 4Wi-Fi 5 (Wi-Fi 6 optional)
Bluetooth4.25.4

Media

Media comparison: Unisoc SC9863A versus Unisoc T7300
SpecUnisoc SC9863AUnisoc T7300
Max displayHD+ @ 60HzFHD+ @ 120Hz
Video capture1080p@30fps2K@30fps

Benchmarks

Benchmarks comparison: Unisoc SC9863A versus Unisoc T7300
SpecUnisoc SC9863AUnisoc T7300
AnTuTu100,000—
Geekbench 6 (single)120Bottom 1%—
Geekbench 6 (multi)430Bottom 1%—

Related comparisons

Try another matchup