Skip to content
InnoReviews

Unisoc T610 vs Unisoc T7300

Unisoc T610
20.6Inno Score
VS
Unisoc T7300
—Inno Score
20CPU25.3
21.6GPU65
20Efficiencyspec-based36
0 spec wins — Unisoc T6104 spec wins — Unisoc T7300

InnoReviews verdict

No overall winner yet: Unisoc T7300 lacks the published benchmark results an Inno Score requires, so there is no Inno Score to compare — we don't rank chips on their spec sheet alone. The spec table below still shows every difference we track.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the Unisoc T610

No decisive spec advantages — this side competes on price and preference.

Reasons to pick the Unisoc T7300

  • Stronger CPU score: 25 vs 20
  • Stronger GPU score: 65 vs 22
  • 55% higher GPU clock: 950 MHz vs 614 MHz
  • 50% lower process: 6 nm vs 12 nm
  • 22% higher Max clock: 2.2 GHz vs 1.8 GHz

General

General comparison: Unisoc T610 versus Unisoc T7300
SpecUnisoc T610Unisoc T7300
Announced20212025
Process12 nm6 nm+50%
ArchitectureArmv8.2Armv8.2

CPU

CPU comparison: Unisoc T610 versus Unisoc T7300
SpecUnisoc T610Unisoc T7300
Cores88
Core configuration2x1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 + 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A552x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 + 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55
Max clock1.8 GHz2.2 GHz+22%

GPU

GPU comparison: Unisoc T610 versus Unisoc T7300
SpecUnisoc T610Unisoc T7300
GPUArm Mali-G52 MP2Arm Mali-G57 MC2
GPU clock614 MHz950 MHz+55%

Memory

Memory comparison: Unisoc T610 versus Unisoc T7300
SpecUnisoc T610Unisoc T7300
Memory typeLPDDR4X-1600 / LPDDR3-933LPDDR4X-2133

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: Unisoc T610 versus Unisoc T7300
SpecUnisoc T610Unisoc T7300
ModemIntegrated LTE Cat-7Integrated LTE Cat-7 (DL) / Cat-13 (UL)
Wi-FiWi-Fi 5Wi-Fi 5 (Wi-Fi 6 optional)
Bluetooth5.05.4

Media

Media comparison: Unisoc T610 versus Unisoc T7300
SpecUnisoc T610Unisoc T7300
Max displayFHD+ (2400x1080)FHD+ @ 120Hz
Video capture1080p@60fps2K@30fps

Benchmarks

Benchmarks comparison: Unisoc T610 versus Unisoc T7300
SpecUnisoc T610Unisoc T7300
Geekbench 6 (single)417Bottom 12%—
Geekbench 6 (multi)1,361Bottom 13%—
3DMark Wild Life Extreme135Bottom 3%—

Related comparisons

Try another matchup