Skip to content
InnoReviews

Unisoc T610 vs Unisoc Tiger T760

Unisoc T610
20.6Inno Score
VS
WINNER
Unisoc Tiger T760
33.4Inno Score
20CPU22.8
21.6GPU—
—Benchmarks33.1
20Efficiencyspec-based54.9
0 spec wins — Unisoc T6105 spec wins — Unisoc Tiger T760

InnoReviews verdict

Unisoc Tiger T760 wins this mobile chipset face-off, 33.4 to 20.6, pulling ahead mainly in CPU (+3). Unisoc T610 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the Unisoc T610

No decisive spec advantages — this side competes on price and preference.

Reasons to pick the Unisoc Tiger T760

  • 50% lower process: 6 nm vs 12 nm
  • 44% higher Geekbench 6 (single): 600 vs 417
  • 40% higher Geekbench 6 (multi): 1,900 vs 1,361
  • 22% higher Max clock: 2.2 GHz vs 1.8 GHz

General

General comparison: Unisoc T610 versus Unisoc Tiger T760
SpecUnisoc T610Unisoc Tiger T760
Announced20212022
Process12 nm6 nm+50%
TDP (typical)—5 W
ArchitectureArmv8.2Armv8.2

CPU

CPU comparison: Unisoc T610 versus Unisoc Tiger T760
SpecUnisoc T610Unisoc Tiger T760
Cores88
Core configuration2x1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 + 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A554x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 + 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55
Max clock1.8 GHz2.2 GHz+22%

GPU

GPU comparison: Unisoc T610 versus Unisoc Tiger T760
SpecUnisoc T610Unisoc Tiger T760
GPUArm Mali-G52 MP2Arm Mali-G57 MP4
GPU clock614 MHz—

Memory

Memory comparison: Unisoc T610 versus Unisoc Tiger T760
SpecUnisoc T610Unisoc Tiger T760
Memory typeLPDDR4X-1600 / LPDDR3-933LPDDR4X-2133
Max bandwidth—17.1 GB/s

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: Unisoc T610 versus Unisoc Tiger T760
SpecUnisoc T610Unisoc Tiger T760
ModemIntegrated LTE Cat-7Integrated 5G (sub-6)
Wi-FiWi-Fi 5Wi-Fi 6
Bluetooth5.05.2

Media

Media comparison: Unisoc T610 versus Unisoc Tiger T760
SpecUnisoc T610Unisoc Tiger T760
Max displayFHD+ (2400x1080)FHD+ @ 120Hz
Video capture1080p@60fps4K@30fps

Benchmarks

Benchmarks comparison: Unisoc T610 versus Unisoc Tiger T760
SpecUnisoc T610Unisoc Tiger T760
AnTuTu—420,000
Geekbench 6 (single)417Bottom 12%600+44%Bottom 23%
Geekbench 6 (multi)1,361Bottom 13%1,900+40%Bottom 24%
3DMark Wild Life Extreme135Bottom 3%—

Related comparisons

Try another matchup