iQOO Pad5c vs Teclast ArtPad
46.7Performance46.7
74.8Display77.1
57.9Battery50.9
60.6Portability—
57.2Features57.2
2 spec wins — iQOO Pad5c1 spec wins — Teclast ArtPad
InnoReviews verdict
This one is close to a dead heat: iQOO Pad5c scores 58.9 against 57.8 for Teclast ArtPad. Pick by the categories that matter to you — iQOO Pad5c edges ahead in battery, or by price.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the iQOO Pad5c
- Stronger battery score: 58 vs 51
- 144% higher charging: 44 W vs 18 W
- 20% higher Refresh rate: 144 Hz vs 120 Hz
Reasons to pick the Teclast ArtPad
No decisive spec advantages — this side competes on price and preference.
Display
| Spec | iQOO Pad5c | Teclast ArtPad |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 12.1 ″ | 13.2 ″+9% |
| Panel type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Resolution | 1968x2800 | 2240x1600 |
| Pixel density | 283 ppi | — |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz+20% | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 900 nits | — |
Performance
| Spec | iQOO Pad5c | Teclast ArtPad |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 | Unisoc T7300 |
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage options | 128GB / 256GB | 128GB |
Battery
| Spec | iQOO Pad5c | Teclast ArtPad |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 10,000 mAh | 10,000 mAh |
| Charging | 44 W+144% | 18 W |
Design
| Spec | iQOO Pad5c | Teclast ArtPad |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 584 g | — |
| Thickness | 6.6 mm | — |
Camera
| Spec | iQOO Pad5c | Teclast ArtPad |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 8 MP | 8 MP |
| Front camera | 5 MP | 5 MP |
Connectivity
| Spec | iQOO Pad5c | Teclast ArtPad |
|---|---|---|
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| Cellular | Wi-Fi only | — |
| USB | USB-C 3.2, OTG | USB-C |
Features
| Spec | iQOO Pad5c | Teclast ArtPad |
|---|---|---|
| Stylus | iQOO Pencil3 / Pencil2s (sold separately) | Active stylus |
| Keyboard support | Yes | Yes |
| Speakers | 4-speaker | Dual stereo speakers |
| Operating system | Android 16 (OriginOS 6) | Android 16 |