Skip to content
InnoReviews

Apple M1 (8-core) vs Intel Core Ultra 9 185H

Apple M1 (8-core)
34.4Inno Score
VS
WINNER
I
50.8Inno Score
36.5Single-core47.3
20.8Multi-core42.6
77.1Efficiency43
0iGPU78
20Platform65.4
1 spec wins — Apple M1 (8-core)11 spec wins — Intel Core Ultra 9 185H

InnoReviews verdict

Intel Core Ultra 9 185H wins this laptop processor face-off, 50.8 to 34.4, pulling ahead mainly in iGPU (+78) and platform (+45). Apple M1 (8-core) still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.

Key differences

Reasons to pick the Apple M1 (8-core)

  • Stronger efficiency score: 77 vs 43
  • 29% lower process: 5 nm vs 7 nm

Reasons to pick the Intel Core Ultra 9 185H

  • Stronger Single-core score: 47 vs 37
  • Stronger Multi-core score: 43 vs 21
  • Stronger platform score: 65 vs 20
  • 500% higher Max memory: 96 GB vs 16 GB
  • 175% higher threads: 22 vs 8

General

General comparison: Apple M1 (8-core) versus Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
SpecApple M1 (8-core)Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
Announced20202024
Process5 nm+29%7 nm
Base TDP45 W
Max TDP115 W

Cores & Clocks

Cores & Clocks comparison: Apple M1 (8-core) versus Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
SpecApple M1 (8-core)Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
Cores816+100%
Performance cores46+50%
Efficiency cores410+150%
Threads822+175%
Base clock2.3 GHz
Boost clock3.2 GHz5.1 GHz+59%
L3 cache24 MB

Integrated GPU

Integrated GPU comparison: Apple M1 (8-core) versus Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
SpecApple M1 (8-core)Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
iGPUApple 8-core GPUIntel Arc Graphics (8 Xe)
iGPU clock2,350 MHz

Memory

Memory comparison: Apple M1 (8-core) versus Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
SpecApple M1 (8-core)Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
Memory supportLPDDR4X-4266LPDDR5X-7467 / DDR5-5600
Max memory16 GB96 GB+500%

Benchmarks

Benchmarks comparison: Apple M1 (8-core) versus Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
SpecApple M1 (8-core)Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
Geekbench 6 (single)2,3402,430+4%
Geekbench 6 (multi)8,35013,400+60%
Cinebench R23 (single)1,5001,790+19%
Cinebench R23 (multi)7,76017,300+123%
PassMark30,100

Related comparisons

Try another matchup