Skip to content
InnoReviews

Apple M1 Pro (10-core) vs Intel Core Ultra X9 388H

Apple M1 Pro (10-core)
53.2Inno Score
VS
WINNER
Intel Core Ultra X9 388H
69.6Inno Score
54.6Single-core74.6
46.3Multi-core61.3
80Efficiencyspec-based81.4
—iGPU88.3
40Platformspec-based56.4
1 spec wins — Apple M1 Pro (10-core)12 spec wins — Intel Core Ultra X9 388H

InnoReviews verdict

Intel Core Ultra X9 388H wins this laptop processor face-off, 69.6 to 53.2, pulling ahead mainly in single-core (+20) and multi-core (+15). Apple M1 Pro (10-core) still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the Apple M1 Pro (10-core)

  • 100% higher Performance cores: 8 vs 4

Reasons to pick the Intel Core Ultra X9 388H

  • Stronger single-core score: 75 vs 55
  • Stronger multi-core score: 61 vs 46
  • 500% higher Efficiency cores: 12 vs 2
  • 200% higher Max memory: 96 GB vs 32 GB
  • 66% higher PassMark: 36,409 vs 21,932

General

General comparison: Apple M1 Pro (10-core) versus Intel Core Ultra X9 388H
SpecApple M1 Pro (10-core)Intel Core Ultra X9 388H
Announced20212026
Process5 nm2 nm+60%
Base TDP—25 W
Max TDP—80 W

Cores & Clocks

Cores & Clocks comparison: Apple M1 Pro (10-core) versus Intel Core Ultra X9 388H
SpecApple M1 Pro (10-core)Intel Core Ultra X9 388H
Cores1016+60%
Performance cores8+100%4
Efficiency cores212+500%
Threads1016+60%
Base clock—2.1 GHz
Boost clock3.2 GHz5.1 GHz+58%
L3 cache—18 MB

Integrated GPU

Integrated GPU comparison: Apple M1 Pro (10-core) versus Intel Core Ultra X9 388H
SpecApple M1 Pro (10-core)Intel Core Ultra X9 388H
iGPUApple 16-core GPUIntel Arc B390
iGPU clock—2,500 MHz

Memory

Memory comparison: Apple M1 Pro (10-core) versus Intel Core Ultra X9 388H
SpecApple M1 Pro (10-core)Intel Core Ultra X9 388H
Memory supportLPDDR5-6400LPDDR5X
Max memory32 GB96 GB+200%

Benchmarks

Benchmarks comparison: Apple M1 Pro (10-core) versus Intel Core Ultra X9 388H
SpecApple M1 Pro (10-core)Intel Core Ultra X9 388H
Geekbench 6 (single)2,380Bottom 35%3,038+28%Top 15%
Geekbench 6 (multi)12,400Top 42%17,395+40%Top 13%
Cinebench R23 (single)1,530Bottom 31%2,201+44%Top 6%
Cinebench R23 (multi)12,350Bottom 50%18,911+53%Top 19%
PassMark21,932Top 48%36,409+66%Top 15%
3DMark Time Spy Graphics (iGPU)—6,501Top 3%

Related comparisons

Try another matchup