Skip to content
InnoReviews

Apple M2 (8-core) vs Intel Core Ultra 9 288V

Apple M2 (8-core)
50.4Inno Score
VS
WINNER
Intel Core Ultra 9 288V
56.6Inno Score
58.1Single-core66.6
38.7Multi-core43.6
80Efficiencyspec-based73.4
—iGPU76.9
35Platformspec-based40.3
0 spec wins — Apple M2 (8-core)9 spec wins — Intel Core Ultra 9 288V

InnoReviews verdict

Intel Core Ultra 9 288V wins this laptop processor face-off, 56.6 to 50.4, pulling ahead mainly in single-core (+8) and multi-core (+5). Apple M2 (8-core) still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the Apple M2 (8-core)

No decisive spec advantages — this side competes on price and preference.

Reasons to pick the Intel Core Ultra 9 288V

  • Stronger single-core score: 67 vs 58
  • Stronger multi-core score: 44 vs 39
  • 46% higher Boost clock: 5.1 GHz vs 3.5 GHz
  • 40% lower process: 3 nm vs 5 nm
  • 33% higher Max memory: 32 GB vs 24 GB

General

General comparison: Apple M2 (8-core) versus Intel Core Ultra 9 288V
SpecApple M2 (8-core)Intel Core Ultra 9 288V
Announced20222024
Process5 nm3 nm+40%
Base TDP—30 W
Max TDP—37 W

Cores & Clocks

Cores & Clocks comparison: Apple M2 (8-core) versus Intel Core Ultra 9 288V
SpecApple M2 (8-core)Intel Core Ultra 9 288V
Cores88
Performance cores44
Efficiency cores44
Threads88
Base clock—3.3 GHz
Boost clock3.5 GHz5.1 GHz+46%
L3 cache—12 MB

Integrated GPU

Integrated GPU comparison: Apple M2 (8-core) versus Intel Core Ultra 9 288V
SpecApple M2 (8-core)Intel Core Ultra 9 288V
iGPUApple 10-core GPUIntel Arc 140V
iGPU clock—2,050 MHz

Memory

Memory comparison: Apple M2 (8-core) versus Intel Core Ultra 9 288V
SpecApple M2 (8-core)Intel Core Ultra 9 288V
Memory supportLPDDR5-6400LPDDR5X-8533 (on-package)
Max memory24 GB32 GB+33%

Benchmarks

Benchmarks comparison: Apple M2 (8-core) versus Intel Core Ultra 9 288V
SpecApple M2 (8-core)Intel Core Ultra 9 288V
Geekbench 6 (single)2,600Top 44%2,870+10%Top 22%
Geekbench 6 (multi)9,750Bottom 38%11,500+18%Top 50%
Cinebench R23 (single)1,580Bottom 34%1,870+18%Top 33%
Cinebench R23 (multi)8,700Bottom 29%10,900+25%Bottom 45%
PassMark15,648Bottom 33%19,780+26%Bottom 49%
3DMark Time Spy Graphics (iGPU)—3,883Top 4%

Related comparisons

Try another matchup