Skip to content
InnoReviews

Apple M2 (8-core) vs Intel Core Ultra 9 288V

Apple M2 (8-core)
39.1Inno Score
VS
WINNER
Intel Core Ultra 9 288V
48.5Inno Score
44Single-core58.1
24.7Multi-core32.4
77.1Efficiency75.7
0iGPU66
26.5Platform31.3
0 spec wins — Apple M2 (8-core)8 spec wins — Intel Core Ultra 9 288V

InnoReviews verdict

Intel Core Ultra 9 288V wins this laptop processor face-off, 48.5 to 39.1, pulling ahead mainly in iGPU (+66) and Single-core (+14). Apple M2 (8-core) still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.

Key differences

Reasons to pick the Apple M2 (8-core)

No decisive spec advantages — this side competes on price and preference.

Reasons to pick the Intel Core Ultra 9 288V

  • Stronger Single-core score: 58 vs 44
  • Stronger Multi-core score: 32 vs 25
  • Stronger platform score: 31 vs 27
  • 46% higher Boost clock: 5.1 GHz vs 3.5 GHz
  • 40% lower process: 3 nm vs 5 nm

General

General comparison: Apple M2 (8-core) versus Intel Core Ultra 9 288V
SpecApple M2 (8-core)Intel Core Ultra 9 288V
Announced20222024
Process5 nm3 nm+40%
Base TDP30 W
Max TDP37 W

Cores & Clocks

Cores & Clocks comparison: Apple M2 (8-core) versus Intel Core Ultra 9 288V
SpecApple M2 (8-core)Intel Core Ultra 9 288V
Cores88
Performance cores44
Efficiency cores44
Threads88
Base clock3.3 GHz
Boost clock3.5 GHz5.1 GHz+46%
L3 cache12 MB

Integrated GPU

Integrated GPU comparison: Apple M2 (8-core) versus Intel Core Ultra 9 288V
SpecApple M2 (8-core)Intel Core Ultra 9 288V
iGPUApple 10-core GPUIntel Arc 140V
iGPU clock2,050 MHz

Memory

Memory comparison: Apple M2 (8-core) versus Intel Core Ultra 9 288V
SpecApple M2 (8-core)Intel Core Ultra 9 288V
Memory supportLPDDR5-6400LPDDR5X-8533 (on-package)
Max memory24 GB32 GB+33%

Benchmarks

Benchmarks comparison: Apple M2 (8-core) versus Intel Core Ultra 9 288V
SpecApple M2 (8-core)Intel Core Ultra 9 288V
Geekbench 6 (single)2,6002,870+10%
Geekbench 6 (multi)9,75011,500+18%
Cinebench R23 (single)1,5801,870+18%
Cinebench R23 (multi)8,70010,900+25%
PassMark25,300

Related comparisons

Try another matchup