Skip to content
InnoReviews

Apple M2 (8-core) vs Intel Core Ultra X9 388H

Apple M2 (8-core)
50.4Inno Score
VS
WINNER
Intel Core Ultra X9 388H
69.6Inno Score
58.1Single-core74.6
38.7Multi-core61.3
80Efficiencyspec-based81.4
—iGPU88.3
35Platformspec-based56.4
0 spec wins — Apple M2 (8-core)12 spec wins — Intel Core Ultra X9 388H

InnoReviews verdict

Intel Core Ultra X9 388H wins this laptop processor face-off, 69.6 to 50.4, pulling ahead mainly in multi-core (+23) and single-core (+16). Apple M2 (8-core) still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the Apple M2 (8-core)

No decisive spec advantages — this side competes on price and preference.

Reasons to pick the Intel Core Ultra X9 388H

  • Stronger single-core score: 75 vs 58
  • Stronger multi-core score: 61 vs 39
  • 300% higher Max memory: 96 GB vs 24 GB
  • 200% higher Efficiency cores: 12 vs 4
  • 133% higher PassMark: 36,409 vs 15,648

General

General comparison: Apple M2 (8-core) versus Intel Core Ultra X9 388H
SpecApple M2 (8-core)Intel Core Ultra X9 388H
Announced20222026
Process5 nm2 nm+60%
Base TDP—25 W
Max TDP—80 W

Cores & Clocks

Cores & Clocks comparison: Apple M2 (8-core) versus Intel Core Ultra X9 388H
SpecApple M2 (8-core)Intel Core Ultra X9 388H
Cores816+100%
Performance cores44
Efficiency cores412+200%
Threads816+100%
Base clock—2.1 GHz
Boost clock3.5 GHz5.1 GHz+46%
L3 cache—18 MB

Integrated GPU

Integrated GPU comparison: Apple M2 (8-core) versus Intel Core Ultra X9 388H
SpecApple M2 (8-core)Intel Core Ultra X9 388H
iGPUApple 10-core GPUIntel Arc B390
iGPU clock—2,500 MHz

Memory

Memory comparison: Apple M2 (8-core) versus Intel Core Ultra X9 388H
SpecApple M2 (8-core)Intel Core Ultra X9 388H
Memory supportLPDDR5-6400LPDDR5X
Max memory24 GB96 GB+300%

Benchmarks

Benchmarks comparison: Apple M2 (8-core) versus Intel Core Ultra X9 388H
SpecApple M2 (8-core)Intel Core Ultra X9 388H
Geekbench 6 (single)2,600Top 44%3,038+17%Top 15%
Geekbench 6 (multi)9,750Bottom 38%17,395+78%Top 13%
Cinebench R23 (single)1,580Bottom 34%2,201+39%Top 6%
Cinebench R23 (multi)8,700Bottom 29%18,911+117%Top 19%
PassMark15,648Bottom 33%36,409+133%Top 15%
3DMark Time Spy Graphics (iGPU)—6,501Top 3%

Related comparisons

Try another matchup