Skip to content
InnoReviews

Apple M3 (8-core) vs Intel Core 5 315

WINNER
Apple M3 (8-core)
57.6Inno Score
VS
Intel Core 5 315
50.7Inno Score
69.8Single-core54
43.3Multi-core35.7
93.3Efficiencyspec-based93
35Platformspec-based37.9
6 spec wins — Apple M3 (8-core)4 spec wins — Intel Core 5 315

InnoReviews verdict

Apple M3 (8-core) wins this laptop processor face-off, 57.6 to 50.7, pulling ahead mainly in single-core (+16) and multi-core (+8). Intel Core 5 315 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the Apple M3 (8-core)

  • Stronger single-core score: 70 vs 54
  • Stronger multi-core score: 43 vs 36
  • 100% higher Performance cores: 4 vs 2
  • 57% higher Geekbench 6 (multi): 11,700 vs 7,454
  • 33% higher cores: 8 vs 6

Reasons to pick the Intel Core 5 315

  • 167% higher Max memory: 64 GB vs 24 GB
  • 33% lower process: 2 nm vs 3 nm

General

General comparison: Apple M3 (8-core) versus Intel Core 5 315
SpecApple M3 (8-core)Intel Core 5 315
Announced20232026
Process3 nm2 nm+33%
Base TDP—15 W
Max TDP—35 W

Cores & Clocks

Cores & Clocks comparison: Apple M3 (8-core) versus Intel Core 5 315
SpecApple M3 (8-core)Intel Core 5 315
Cores8+33%6
Performance cores4+100%2
Efficiency cores44
Threads8+33%6
Base clock—1.5 GHz
Boost clock4.1 GHz4.4 GHz+9%
L3 cache—6 MB

Integrated GPU

Integrated GPU comparison: Apple M3 (8-core) versus Intel Core 5 315
SpecApple M3 (8-core)Intel Core 5 315
iGPUApple 10-core GPUIntel Graphics (2 Xe3-cores)
iGPU clock—2,300 MHz

Memory

Memory comparison: Apple M3 (8-core) versus Intel Core 5 315
SpecApple M3 (8-core)Intel Core 5 315
Memory supportLPDDR5-6400LPDDR5X-7467 / DDR5-6400
Max memory24 GB64 GB+167%

Benchmarks

Benchmarks comparison: Apple M3 (8-core) versus Intel Core 5 315
SpecApple M3 (8-core)Intel Core 5 315
Geekbench 6 (single)3,090+23%Top 15%2,516Bottom 51%
Geekbench 6 (multi)11,700+57%Top 47%7,454Bottom 23%
Cinebench R23 (single)1,900Top 29%—
Cinebench R23 (multi)10,400Bottom 42%—
PassMark19,056+30%Bottom 47%14,672Bottom 29%

Related comparisons

Try another matchup