Skip to content
InnoReviews

Apple M3 Max (16-core) vs Intel Core Ultra 9 386H

WINNER
Apple M3 Max (16-core)
69.6Inno Score
VS
Intel Core Ultra 9 386H
54.5Inno Score
65.6Single-core
66.5Multi-core
93.3Efficiency58.3
60Platform50.7
1 spec wins — Apple M3 Max (16-core)4 spec wins — Intel Core Ultra 9 386H

InnoReviews verdict

Apple M3 Max (16-core) wins this laptop processor face-off, 69.6 to 54.5, pulling ahead mainly in efficiency (+35) and platform (+9). Intel Core Ultra 9 386H still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the Apple M3 Max (16-core)

  • Stronger efficiency score: 93 vs 58
  • Stronger platform score: 60 vs 51
  • 200% higher Performance cores: 12 vs 4

Reasons to pick the Intel Core Ultra 9 386H

  • 200% higher Efficiency cores: 12 vs 4
  • 33% lower process: 2 nm vs 3 nm
  • 21% higher Boost clock: 4.9 GHz vs 4.1 GHz

General

General comparison: Apple M3 Max (16-core) versus Intel Core Ultra 9 386H
SpecApple M3 Max (16-core)Intel Core Ultra 9 386H
Announced20232026
Process3 nm2 nm+33%
Base TDP45 W

Cores & Clocks

Cores & Clocks comparison: Apple M3 Max (16-core) versus Intel Core Ultra 9 386H
SpecApple M3 Max (16-core)Intel Core Ultra 9 386H
Cores1616
Performance cores12+200%4
Efficiency cores412+200%
Threads1616
Base clock2.1 GHz
Boost clock4.1 GHz4.9 GHz+21%
L3 cache18 MB

Integrated GPU

Integrated GPU comparison: Apple M3 Max (16-core) versus Intel Core Ultra 9 386H
SpecApple M3 Max (16-core)Intel Core Ultra 9 386H
iGPUApple 40-core GPUIntel Arc Xe3 Graphics

Memory

Memory comparison: Apple M3 Max (16-core) versus Intel Core Ultra 9 386H
SpecApple M3 Max (16-core)Intel Core Ultra 9 386H
Memory supportLPDDR5-6400LPDDR5X, DDR5
Max memory128 GB

Benchmarks

Benchmarks comparison: Apple M3 Max (16-core) versus Intel Core Ultra 9 386H
SpecApple M3 Max (16-core)Intel Core Ultra 9 386H
Geekbench 6 (single)3,130Top 12%
Geekbench 6 (multi)21,200Top 12%
Cinebench R23 (single)1,950Top 30%
Cinebench R23 (multi)24,200Top 22%

Related comparisons

Try another matchup