Skip to content
InnoReviews

Apple M6 (12-core) vs Qualcomm Snapdragon C

Apple M6 (12-core)
77.1Inno Score
VS
Qualcomm Snapdragon C
—Inno Score
100Single-core—
65.8Multi-core—
100Efficiencyspec-based73.3
42.2Platformspec-based28.9
4 spec wins — Apple M6 (12-core)0 spec wins — Qualcomm Snapdragon C

InnoReviews verdict

No overall winner yet: Qualcomm Snapdragon C lacks the published benchmark results an Inno Score requires, so there is no Inno Score to compare — we don't rank chips on their spec sheet alone. The spec table below still shows every difference we track.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the Apple M6 (12-core)

  • 67% lower process: 2 nm vs 6 nm
  • 60% higher Boost clock: 4.8 GHz vs 3 GHz
  • 50% higher cores: 12 vs 8
  • 50% higher threads: 12 vs 8

Reasons to pick the Qualcomm Snapdragon C

No decisive spec advantages — this side competes on price and preference.

General

General comparison: Apple M6 (12-core) versus Qualcomm Snapdragon C
SpecApple M6 (12-core)Qualcomm Snapdragon C
Announced20262026
Process2 nm+67%6 nm

Cores & Clocks

Cores & Clocks comparison: Apple M6 (12-core) versus Qualcomm Snapdragon C
SpecApple M6 (12-core)Qualcomm Snapdragon C
Cores12+50%8
Performance cores6—
Efficiency cores6—
Threads12+50%8
Boost clock4.8 GHz+60%3 GHz

Integrated GPU

Integrated GPU comparison: Apple M6 (12-core) versus Qualcomm Snapdragon C
SpecApple M6 (12-core)Qualcomm Snapdragon C
iGPUApple 12-core GPUQualcomm Adreno A643
iGPU clock—900 MHz

Memory

Memory comparison: Apple M6 (12-core) versus Qualcomm Snapdragon C
SpecApple M6 (12-core)Qualcomm Snapdragon C
Memory supportLPDDR5X—
Max memory32 GB—

Benchmarks

Benchmarks comparison: Apple M6 (12-core) versus Qualcomm Snapdragon C
SpecApple M6 (12-core)Qualcomm Snapdragon C
Geekbench 6 (single)4,610Top 2%—
Geekbench 6 (multi)20,676Top 15%—
PassMark36,209Top 30%—

Related comparisons

Try another matchup