Skip to content
InnoReviews

Huawei Kirin X90 Plus vs Intel Celeron N4500

Huawei Kirin X90 Plus
—Inno Score
VS
Intel Celeron N4500
30Inno Score
—Single-core20
—Multi-core20
67Efficiencyspec-based82.2
—iGPU20
—Platformspec-based24.4
1 spec wins — Huawei Kirin X90 Plus1 spec wins — Intel Celeron N4500

InnoReviews verdict

No overall winner yet: Huawei Kirin X90 Plus lacks the published benchmark results an Inno Score requires, so there is no Inno Score to compare — we don't rank chips on their spec sheet alone. The spec table below still shows every difference we track.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the Huawei Kirin X90 Plus

No decisive spec advantages — this side competes on price and preference.

Reasons to pick the Intel Celeron N4500

  • 79% lower Base TDP: 6 W vs 28 W

General

General comparison: Huawei Kirin X90 Plus versus Intel Celeron N4500
SpecHuawei Kirin X90 PlusIntel Celeron N4500
Announced20262021
Process—10 nm
Base TDP28 W6 W+79%

Cores & Clocks

Cores & Clocks comparison: Huawei Kirin X90 Plus versus Intel Celeron N4500
SpecHuawei Kirin X90 PlusIntel Celeron N4500
Cores—2
Performance cores—0
Efficiency cores—2
Threads—2
Base clock—1.1 GHz
Boost clock—2.8 GHz
L3 cache—4 MB

Integrated GPU

Integrated GPU comparison: Huawei Kirin X90 Plus versus Intel Celeron N4500
SpecHuawei Kirin X90 PlusIntel Celeron N4500
iGPU—Intel UHD Graphics (16 EU)
iGPU clock—750 MHz

Memory

Memory comparison: Huawei Kirin X90 Plus versus Intel Celeron N4500
SpecHuawei Kirin X90 PlusIntel Celeron N4500
Memory support—DDR4-2933, LPDDR4x-2933
Max memory—16 GB

Benchmarks

Benchmarks comparison: Huawei Kirin X90 Plus versus Intel Celeron N4500
SpecHuawei Kirin X90 PlusIntel Celeron N4500
Cinebench R23 (single)—452Bottom 3%
Cinebench R23 (multi)—709Bottom 3%
PassMark—1,760Bottom 2%
3DMark Time Spy Graphics (iGPU)—168Bottom 3%

Related comparisons

Try another matchup