Skip to content
InnoReviews

Intel Core 5 315 vs Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX

Intel Core 5 315
50.7Inno Score
VS
WINNER
Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX
72.2Inno Score
54Single-core76.8
35.7Multi-core83.4
93Efficiencyspec-based44.4
—iGPU60.5
37.9Platformspec-based73.9
3 spec wins — Intel Core 5 31512 spec wins — Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX

InnoReviews verdict

Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX wins this laptop processor face-off, 72.2 to 50.7, pulling ahead mainly in multi-core (+48) and single-core (+23). Intel Core 5 315 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the Intel Core 5 315

  • 73% lower Base TDP: 15 W vs 55 W
  • 33% lower process: 2 nm vs 3 nm

Reasons to pick the Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX

  • Stronger single-core score: 77 vs 54
  • Stronger multi-core score: 83 vs 36
  • 500% higher L3 cache: 36 MB vs 6 MB
  • 357% higher Max TDP: 160 W vs 35 W
  • 300% higher cores: 24 vs 6

General

General comparison: Intel Core 5 315 versus Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX
SpecIntel Core 5 315Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX
Announced20262025
Process2 nm+33%3 nm
Base TDP15 W+73%55 W
Max TDP35 W160 W+357%

Cores & Clocks

Cores & Clocks comparison: Intel Core 5 315 versus Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX
SpecIntel Core 5 315Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX
Cores624+300%
Performance cores28+300%
Efficiency cores416+300%
Threads624+300%
Base clock1.5 GHz2.8 GHz+87%
Boost clock4.4 GHz5.5 GHz+25%
L3 cache6 MB36 MB+500%

Integrated GPU

Integrated GPU comparison: Intel Core 5 315 versus Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX
SpecIntel Core 5 315Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX
iGPUIntel Graphics (2 Xe3-cores)Intel Graphics (4 Xe-cores)
iGPU clock2,300 MHz2,000 MHz

Memory

Memory comparison: Intel Core 5 315 versus Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX
SpecIntel Core 5 315Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX
Memory supportLPDDR5X-7467 / DDR5-6400DDR5-6400
Max memory64 GB256 GB+300%

Benchmarks

Benchmarks comparison: Intel Core 5 315 versus Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX
SpecIntel Core 5 315Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX
Geekbench 6 (single)2,516Bottom 51%3,150+25%Top 11%
Geekbench 6 (multi)7,454Bottom 23%20,500+175%Top 10%
Cinebench R23 (single)—2,250Top 3%
Cinebench R23 (multi)—37,500Top 2%
PassMark14,672Bottom 29%56,512+285%Top 4%
3DMark Time Spy Graphics (iGPU)—1,855Top 37%

Related comparisons

Try another matchup