Skip to content
InnoReviews

Intel Core 5 315 vs Intel Core Ultra X9 388H

Intel Core 5 315
50.7Inno Score
VS
WINNER
Intel Core Ultra X9 388H
69.6Inno Score
54Single-core74.6
35.7Multi-core61.3
93Efficiencyspec-based81.4
—iGPU88.3
37.9Platformspec-based56.4
1 spec wins — Intel Core 5 31512 spec wins — Intel Core Ultra X9 388H

InnoReviews verdict

Intel Core Ultra X9 388H wins this laptop processor face-off, 69.6 to 50.7, pulling ahead mainly in multi-core (+26) and single-core (+21). Intel Core 5 315 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the Intel Core 5 315

  • 40% lower Base TDP: 15 W vs 25 W

Reasons to pick the Intel Core Ultra X9 388H

  • Stronger single-core score: 75 vs 54
  • Stronger multi-core score: 61 vs 36
  • 200% higher Efficiency cores: 12 vs 4
  • 200% higher L3 cache: 18 MB vs 6 MB
  • 167% higher cores: 16 vs 6

General

General comparison: Intel Core 5 315 versus Intel Core Ultra X9 388H
SpecIntel Core 5 315Intel Core Ultra X9 388H
Announced20262026
Process2 nm2 nm
Base TDP15 W+40%25 W
Max TDP35 W80 W+129%

Cores & Clocks

Cores & Clocks comparison: Intel Core 5 315 versus Intel Core Ultra X9 388H
SpecIntel Core 5 315Intel Core Ultra X9 388H
Cores616+167%
Performance cores24+100%
Efficiency cores412+200%
Threads616+167%
Base clock1.5 GHz2.1 GHz+40%
Boost clock4.4 GHz5.1 GHz+16%
L3 cache6 MB18 MB+200%

Integrated GPU

Integrated GPU comparison: Intel Core 5 315 versus Intel Core Ultra X9 388H
SpecIntel Core 5 315Intel Core Ultra X9 388H
iGPUIntel Graphics (2 Xe3-cores)Intel Arc B390
iGPU clock2,300 MHz2,500 MHz

Memory

Memory comparison: Intel Core 5 315 versus Intel Core Ultra X9 388H
SpecIntel Core 5 315Intel Core Ultra X9 388H
Memory supportLPDDR5X-7467 / DDR5-6400LPDDR5X
Max memory64 GB96 GB+50%

Benchmarks

Benchmarks comparison: Intel Core 5 315 versus Intel Core Ultra X9 388H
SpecIntel Core 5 315Intel Core Ultra X9 388H
Geekbench 6 (single)2,516Bottom 51%3,038+21%Top 17%
Geekbench 6 (multi)7,454Bottom 23%17,395+133%Top 14%
Cinebench R23 (single)—2,201Top 6%
Cinebench R23 (multi)—18,911Top 17%
PassMark14,672Bottom 29%36,409+148%Top 15%
3DMark Time Spy Graphics (iGPU)—6,501Top 3%

Related comparisons

Try another matchup