Skip to content
InnoReviews

Intel Core i3-N305 vs Intel Core Ultra X9 388H

Intel Core i3-N305
36.9Inno Score
VS
WINNER
Intel Core Ultra X9 388H
69.6Inno Score
31.4Single-core74.6
28Multi-core61.3
75.3Efficiencyspec-based81.4
34.1iGPU88.3
30.5Platformspec-based56.4
1 spec wins — Intel Core i3-N30517 spec wins — Intel Core Ultra X9 388H

InnoReviews verdict

Intel Core Ultra X9 388H wins this laptop processor face-off, 69.6 to 36.9, pulling ahead mainly in iGPU (+54) and single-core (+43). Intel Core i3-N305 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the Intel Core i3-N305

  • 40% lower Base TDP: 15 W vs 25 W

Reasons to pick the Intel Core Ultra X9 388H

  • Stronger single-core score: 75 vs 31
  • Stronger multi-core score: 61 vs 28
  • Stronger iGPU score: 88 vs 34
  • 1047% higher 3DMark Time Spy Graphics (iGPU): 6,501 vs 567
  • 500% higher Max memory: 96 GB vs 16 GB

General

General comparison: Intel Core i3-N305 versus Intel Core Ultra X9 388H
SpecIntel Core i3-N305Intel Core Ultra X9 388H
Announced20232026
Process10 nm2 nm+80%
Base TDP15 W+40%25 W
Max TDP35 W80 W+129%

Cores & Clocks

Cores & Clocks comparison: Intel Core i3-N305 versus Intel Core Ultra X9 388H
SpecIntel Core i3-N305Intel Core Ultra X9 388H
Cores816+100%
Performance cores04
Efficiency cores812+50%
Threads816+100%
Base clock1.8 GHz2.1 GHz+17%
Boost clock3.8 GHz5.1 GHz+34%
L3 cache6 MB18 MB+200%

Integrated GPU

Integrated GPU comparison: Intel Core i3-N305 versus Intel Core Ultra X9 388H
SpecIntel Core i3-N305Intel Core Ultra X9 388H
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics (32 EU)Intel Arc B390
iGPU clock1,250 MHz2,500 MHz

Memory

Memory comparison: Intel Core i3-N305 versus Intel Core Ultra X9 388H
SpecIntel Core i3-N305Intel Core Ultra X9 388H
Memory supportDDR4-3200, DDR5-4800, LPDDR5-4800LPDDR5X
Max memory16 GB96 GB+500%

Benchmarks

Benchmarks comparison: Intel Core i3-N305 versus Intel Core Ultra X9 388H
SpecIntel Core i3-N305Intel Core Ultra X9 388H
Geekbench 6 (single)1,274Bottom 6%3,038+138%Top 19%
Geekbench 6 (multi)4,681Bottom 9%17,395+272%Top 16%
Cinebench R23 (single)983Bottom 9%2,201+124%Top 7%
Cinebench R23 (multi)5,049Bottom 13%18,911+275%Top 19%
PassMark9,350Bottom 17%36,409+289%Top 16%
3DMark Time Spy Graphics (iGPU)567Bottom 23%6,501+1047%Top 3%

Related comparisons

Try another matchup