Skip to content
InnoReviews

Intel Core Ultra 9 386H vs Qualcomm Snapdragon C

Intel Core Ultra 9 386H
66.5Inno Score
VS
Qualcomm Snapdragon C
—Inno Score
70.3Single-core—
60Multi-core—
81.4Efficiencyspec-based73.3
70iGPU—
58.2Platformspec-based28.9
4 spec wins — Intel Core Ultra 9 386H0 spec wins — Qualcomm Snapdragon C

InnoReviews verdict

No overall winner yet: Qualcomm Snapdragon C lacks the published benchmark results an Inno Score requires, so there is no Inno Score to compare — we don't rank chips on their spec sheet alone. The spec table below still shows every difference we track.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the Intel Core Ultra 9 386H

  • 100% higher cores: 16 vs 8
  • 100% higher threads: 16 vs 8
  • 67% lower process: 2 nm vs 6 nm
  • 63% higher Boost clock: 4.9 GHz vs 3 GHz

Reasons to pick the Qualcomm Snapdragon C

No decisive spec advantages — this side competes on price and preference.

General

General comparison: Intel Core Ultra 9 386H versus Qualcomm Snapdragon C
SpecIntel Core Ultra 9 386HQualcomm Snapdragon C
Announced20262026
Process2 nm+67%6 nm
Base TDP25 W—
Max TDP80 W—

Cores & Clocks

Cores & Clocks comparison: Intel Core Ultra 9 386H versus Qualcomm Snapdragon C
SpecIntel Core Ultra 9 386HQualcomm Snapdragon C
Cores16+100%8
Performance cores4—
Efficiency cores12—
Threads16+100%8
Base clock2.1 GHz—
Boost clock4.9 GHz+63%3 GHz
L3 cache18 MB—

Integrated GPU

Integrated GPU comparison: Intel Core Ultra 9 386H versus Qualcomm Snapdragon C
SpecIntel Core Ultra 9 386HQualcomm Snapdragon C
iGPUIntel Graphics (4 Xe3-cores)Qualcomm Adreno A643
iGPU clock2,500 MHz900 MHz

Memory

Memory comparison: Intel Core Ultra 9 386H versus Qualcomm Snapdragon C
SpecIntel Core Ultra 9 386HQualcomm Snapdragon C
Memory supportLPDDR5X, DDR5—
Max memory128 GB—

Benchmarks

Benchmarks comparison: Intel Core Ultra 9 386H versus Qualcomm Snapdragon C
SpecIntel Core Ultra 9 386HQualcomm Snapdragon C
Geekbench 6 (single)2,876Top 21%—
Geekbench 6 (multi)16,298Top 18%—
Cinebench R23 (single)2,069Top 14%—
Cinebench R23 (multi)19,307Top 18%—
PassMark36,060Top 16%—
3DMark Time Spy Graphics (iGPU)2,846Top 21%—

Related comparisons

Try another matchup