Skip to content
InnoReviews

Intel Core Ultra X9 388H vs Qualcomm Snapdragon C

Intel Core Ultra X9 388H
69.6Inno Score
VS
Qualcomm Snapdragon C
—Inno Score
74.6Single-core—
61.3Multi-core—
81.4Efficiencyspec-based73.3
88.3iGPU—
56.4Platformspec-based28.9
4 spec wins — Intel Core Ultra X9 388H0 spec wins — Qualcomm Snapdragon C

InnoReviews verdict

No overall winner yet: Qualcomm Snapdragon C lacks the published benchmark results an Inno Score requires, so there is no Inno Score to compare — we don't rank chips on their spec sheet alone. The spec table below still shows every difference we track.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the Intel Core Ultra X9 388H

  • 100% higher cores: 16 vs 8
  • 100% higher threads: 16 vs 8
  • 70% higher Boost clock: 5.1 GHz vs 3 GHz
  • 67% lower process: 2 nm vs 6 nm

Reasons to pick the Qualcomm Snapdragon C

No decisive spec advantages — this side competes on price and preference.

General

General comparison: Intel Core Ultra X9 388H versus Qualcomm Snapdragon C
SpecIntel Core Ultra X9 388HQualcomm Snapdragon C
Announced20262026
Process2 nm+67%6 nm
Base TDP25 W—
Max TDP80 W—

Cores & Clocks

Cores & Clocks comparison: Intel Core Ultra X9 388H versus Qualcomm Snapdragon C
SpecIntel Core Ultra X9 388HQualcomm Snapdragon C
Cores16+100%8
Performance cores4—
Efficiency cores12—
Threads16+100%8
Base clock2.1 GHz—
Boost clock5.1 GHz+70%3 GHz
L3 cache18 MB—

Integrated GPU

Integrated GPU comparison: Intel Core Ultra X9 388H versus Qualcomm Snapdragon C
SpecIntel Core Ultra X9 388HQualcomm Snapdragon C
iGPUIntel Arc B390Qualcomm Adreno A643
iGPU clock2,500 MHz900 MHz

Memory

Memory comparison: Intel Core Ultra X9 388H versus Qualcomm Snapdragon C
SpecIntel Core Ultra X9 388HQualcomm Snapdragon C
Memory supportLPDDR5X—
Max memory96 GB—

Benchmarks

Benchmarks comparison: Intel Core Ultra X9 388H versus Qualcomm Snapdragon C
SpecIntel Core Ultra X9 388HQualcomm Snapdragon C
Geekbench 6 (single)3,038Top 15%—
Geekbench 6 (multi)17,395Top 13%—
Cinebench R23 (single)2,201Top 6%—
Cinebench R23 (multi)18,911Top 19%—
PassMark36,409Top 15%—
3DMark Time Spy Graphics (iGPU)6,501Top 3%—

Related comparisons

Try another matchup