Alienware 16 Aurora (AC16250) vs ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607
51.1Performance44
31.8Display37.4
94.7Battery86.7
32.7Portability35.9
5 spec wins — Alienware 16 Aurora (AC16250)3 spec wins — ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607
InnoReviews verdict
Alienware 16 Aurora (AC16250) wins this laptop face-off, 52.6 to 50.3, pulling ahead mainly in battery (+8) and performance (+7). ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Alienware 16 Aurora (AC16250)
- Stronger performance score: 51 vs 44
- Stronger battery score: 95 vs 87
- 100% higher RAM: 32 GB vs 16 GB
- 100% higher storage: 1,024 GB vs 512 GB
- 20% lower thickness: 22.7 mm vs 28.2 mm
Reasons to pick the ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607
- Stronger display score: 37 vs 32
- Stronger portability score: 36 vs 33
- 38% higher Refresh rate: 165 Hz vs 120 Hz
- 33% higher charging: 240 W vs 180 W
- 12% lower weight: 2.27 kg vs 2.57 kg
Display
| Spec | Alienware 16 Aurora (AC16250) | ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607 |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 16 ″ | 16 ″ |
| Panel type | IPS | IPS-level (G-Sync) |
| Resolution | 2560x1600 | 1920x1200 |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 165 Hz+38% |
| Peak brightness | 300 nits+10% | 273 nits |
Performance
| Spec | Alienware 16 Aurora (AC16250) | ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607 |
|---|---|---|
| Processor | Intel Core 7 240H | Intel Core i7-13650HX |
| Graphics | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop |
| RAM | 32 GB+100% | 16 GB |
| RAM type | DDR5-5600 (2x SO-DIMM) | DDR5-4800 (2x SO-DIMM) |
| Storage | 1,024 GB+100% | 512 GB |
| Storage type | PCIe 4.0 NVMe SSD (2 M.2 slots) | PCIe 4.0 NVMe SSD (2 slots) |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Alienware 16 Aurora (AC16250) | ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607 |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 2,699Bottom 49% | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 13,815Top 43% | — |
Battery
| Spec | Alienware 16 Aurora (AC16250) | ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607 |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 96 Wh+7% | 90 Wh |
| Charging | 180 W | 240 W+33% |
Design
| Spec | Alienware 16 Aurora (AC16250) | ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607 |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 2.57 kg | 2.27 kg+12% |
| Thickness | 22.7 mm+20% | 28.2 mm |
| Material | Anodized aluminum lid, plastic deck and base, magnesium alloy internal frame | Aluminum lid, plastic base |
Connectivity
| Spec | Alienware 16 Aurora (AC16250) | ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607 |
|---|---|---|
| Ports | 2x USB-C 3.2 Gen 2 (one with DisplayPort 1.4, one with Power Delivery), 2x USB-A 3.2 Gen 1, HDMI 2.1, Gigabit Ethernet, 3.5mm headset jack | Thunderbolt 4, USB 3.2 Gen 2 Type-C (DisplayPort, power delivery), 2x USB 3.2 Gen 1 Type-A, HDMI 2.1, RJ45 Ethernet, 3.5mm combo audio |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax) |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.2 |
| Webcam | 720p | 720p HD |
| Biometrics | None | None |
Software
| Spec | Alienware 16 Aurora (AC16250) | ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607 |
|---|---|---|
| Operating system | Windows 11 Home | Windows 11 |
Related comparisons
Alienware 16 Aurora (AC16250)vs Microsoft Surface Laptop 15-inch (8th Edition)VSAlienware 16 Aurora (AC16250)vs Razer Blade 14 (2025)VSAlienware 16 Aurora (AC16250)vs COLORFIRE MEOW X16 Pro (2026)VSAlienware 16 Aurora (AC16250)vs Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14VSASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607vs HP Spectre x360 14 (2024)VSASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607vs Dell XPS 13 (9345)VSASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607vs Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Aura Edition (15", 9)VSASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607vs Samsung Galaxy Book4 UltraVS