Skip to content
InnoReviews

ASUS TUF Gaming A14 (2024) vs MSI Crosshair 16 HX E14W

ASUS TUF Gaming A14 (2024)
54Inno Score
VS
MSI Crosshair 16 HX E14W
54Inno Score
48.5Performance50.9
41.5Display53.8
64Battery73.3
69.8Portability37
3 spec wins — ASUS TUF Gaming A14 (2024)6 spec wins — MSI Crosshair 16 HX E14W

InnoReviews verdict

This one is close to a dead heat: ASUS TUF Gaming A14 (2024) scores 54 against 54 for MSI Crosshair 16 HX E14W. Pick by the categories that matter to you — ASUS TUF Gaming A14 (2024) edges ahead in portability, or by price.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the ASUS TUF Gaming A14 (2024)

  • Stronger portability score: 70 vs 37
  • 37% lower weight: 1.46 kg vs 2.3 kg
  • 22% lower thickness: 19.9 mm vs 25.6 mm

Reasons to pick the MSI Crosshair 16 HX E14W

  • Stronger display score: 54 vs 42
  • Stronger battery score: 73 vs 64
  • 45% higher Refresh rate: 240 Hz vs 165 Hz
  • 20% higher charging: 240 W vs 200 W
  • 16% higher Geekbench 6 (multi): 15,982 vs 13,799
  • Lower launch price: $1,299 vs $1,500

Display

Display comparison: ASUS TUF Gaming A14 (2024) versus MSI Crosshair 16 HX E14W
SpecASUS TUF Gaming A14 (2024)MSI Crosshair 16 HX E14W
Screen size14 ″16 ″+14%
Panel typeIPS-level, anti-glare (100% sRGB, G-Sync)IPS-level
Resolution2560x16002560x1600
Refresh rate165 Hz240 Hz+45%
Peak brightness400 nits447 nits+12%

Performance

Performance comparison: ASUS TUF Gaming A14 (2024) versus MSI Crosshair 16 HX E14W
SpecASUS TUF Gaming A14 (2024)MSI Crosshair 16 HX E14W
ProcessorAMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370Intel Core i7-14650HX
GraphicsNVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (8GB GDDR6)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop GPU (8GB GDDR7)
RAM16 GB16 GB
RAM typeLPDDR5X-7500 (soldered)DDR5-5600
Storage1,024 GB1,024 GB
Storage typeM.2 2280 NVMe PCIe 4.0 SSD (2 slots)PCIe 4.0 NVMe SSD

Benchmarks

Benchmarks comparison: ASUS TUF Gaming A14 (2024) versus MSI Crosshair 16 HX E14W
SpecASUS TUF Gaming A14 (2024)MSI Crosshair 16 HX E14W
Geekbench 6 (single)2,846+4%Top 46%2,732Bottom 41%
Geekbench 6 (multi)13,799Top 49%15,982+16%Top 33%

Battery

Battery comparison: ASUS TUF Gaming A14 (2024) versus MSI Crosshair 16 HX E14W
SpecASUS TUF Gaming A14 (2024)MSI Crosshair 16 HX E14W
Capacity73 Wh80 Wh+10%
Charging200 W240 W+20%

Design

Design comparison: ASUS TUF Gaming A14 (2024) versus MSI Crosshair 16 HX E14W
SpecASUS TUF Gaming A14 (2024)MSI Crosshair 16 HX E14W
Weight1.46 kg+37%2.3 kg
Thickness19.9 mm+22%25.6 mm
MaterialAluminum lid and bottom panel, plastic keyboard deck (MIL-STD-810H tested)—

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: ASUS TUF Gaming A14 (2024) versus MSI Crosshair 16 HX E14W
SpecASUS TUF Gaming A14 (2024)MSI Crosshair 16 HX E14W
Ports1x USB4 (DisplayPort/PD), 1x USB 3.2 Gen 2 Type-C (DisplayPort), 2x USB 3.2 Gen 2 Type-A, 1x HDMI 2.1, microSD reader (UHS-II), 3.5mm combo audio jack2x USB-C (USB 3.2 Gen 2, DisplayPort, PD 3.0), 1x USB-A 3.2 Gen 2, 2x USB-A 3.2 Gen 1, HDMI 2.1, RJ45, 3.5mm combo jack
Wi-FiWi-Fi 6E (802.11ax)Wi-Fi 6E
Bluetooth5.25.4
Webcam1080p FHD IR camera720p HD
BiometricsWindows Hello IR face recognition—

Software

Software comparison: ASUS TUF Gaming A14 (2024) versus MSI Crosshair 16 HX E14W
SpecASUS TUF Gaming A14 (2024)MSI Crosshair 16 HX E14W
Operating systemWindows 11 HomeWindows 11 Home

Related comparisons

Try another matchup